Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2021, Volume : 9, Issue : 3
First page : (54) Last page : (59)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.6707
Evaluation of F1 Hybrids of Bottle Gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Mol. Stand) for Yield Attributes
Atul Sharma*, V. S. Yadav and Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Division of Horticulture, RARI, Durgapura- Jaipur
S.K.N. Agriculture University, Jobner - 303328, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: atulsharma30000@gmail.com
Received: 6.03.2021 | Revised: 13.04.2021 | Accepted: 20.04.2021
ABSTRACT
An investigation was carried out to study the performance of 28 hybrids of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria mol. stand) through diallel mating design excluding reciprocals. Observations were recorded on the traits, viz., number of primary branches per vine, days to 50% flowering, node number at which first female flower appears, days to initiation of first female flower, number of fruits per vine, days to first fruit harvest, fruit weight, fruit size, hundred seed weight, flesh thickness, vine length and fruit yield per vine besides quality traits such as moisture content and TSS content in the fruit. Among the 28 hybrids of bottle gourd studied, thecross ‘PSPL X Pusa Naveen excelled in yield per vine, followed by the crosses ‘DBG-5XPusa Naveen. Thus, first generation hybrids can be well-utilized for exploiting hybrid vigour to achieve improved quality.
Keywords: Evaluation, Hybrids, Bottle gourd, Generation, Diallel.
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782
Cite this article: Sharma, A., Yadav, V. S., & Sharma, Y.K. (2021). Evaluation of F1 Hybrids of Bottle Gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Mol. Stand) for Yield Attributes, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 9(3), 54-59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.6707
INTRODUCTION
Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Mol. Stand) originated in South Africa, India and is cultivated in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. It is an important cucurbitaceous vegetable crop of India, constituting a principal ingredient in several Indian dishes. Bottle gourd has received little attention in crop improvement compared to other cucurbitaceous vegetables. In bottle gourd, the major problem is its large-sized fruits (5-6 kg each). This is not overly preferred by the present nuclear families of three to four members. Further, with increase in number of such families recently in India, customers prefer to buy only whole fruits of medium-size bottle gourds, instead of cut pieces. Further, small fruits are easily packed and transported, without any damage. Therefore, developing bottle gourd hybrids with small to medium-sized fruits (500-700 gm) is essential. The present study was undertaken to evaluate F1 hybrids for yield and quality for this purpose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The investigation was conducted at experimental farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur during (Zaid, 2016) with 28 F1 hybrids and their parents obtained through diallel mating design excluding reciprocals. The resulting hybrids of 28 cross combinations were evaluated in a Randomized Block Design with three replications during (Zaid, 2017). The crop was grown on a raised bed of 6.0 meter length and 2.4 m width and 15 cm height having sandy loam soil. Between the two beds 2.4 meter distance was kept for proper intercultural operations as well as crop management. On each bed drip line was stretched parallel to bed. Two seeds were sown directly on both side of the bed at 2.0 cm depth. A random sample of five plants from each of the plot (crosses and parents) from each replication and observations on a total of thirteen morphological traits viz., number of primary branches per vine, node number at which first female flower appears, days to 50% flowering days to initiation of first female flower, number of fruits per vine, days to first fruit harvest, fruit weight, fruit size, vine length, fruit yield per vine and per hectare besides two biochemical characters such as moisture content (%) (Roy, 1973) and TSS content (Chopra & Kanwar, 1976) in the fruit were recorded on each of the five randomly selected plants. Statistical analysis of data was done to estimate per se values and degree of significance of various traits (Panse & Sukhatme, 1978).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In Bottle gourd hybrids exhibited significant differences for all the characters under study for growth, yield and quality, thus offering scope for selecting high-yielding hybrids with good quality traits. Results of per se performance of hybrids are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The sca effect of a hybrid denotes deviation from performance prediction based on gca of the parents (Allard, 1960). The sca effect seen is due to dominance, epistasis and environmental influence. Under certain favorable conditions, all the non-additive gene functions may be triggered and may result in high sca effect and mean value of a responding hybrid. Thus, evaluation of a hybrid for high per se and sca effect is also an important criterion. Hybrids with high per se and sca effect were evaluated for selecting the best hybrids. The gca and sca values of parents and hybrids are presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
Table 2: General combining ability effects of bottle gourd parents
Parents |
Days to initiation of first female flower |
Days to 50 % flowering |
No. of nodes at which first female flower |
Primary branches |
Vine length (m) |
Days to first fruit harvest |
Fruit length (cm) |
Fruit girth (cm) |
Fruit weight (kg) |
Marketable fruits per plant |
Total yield (kg) |
P1 |
0.22 |
0.26 |
0.11 |
-0.06* |
-0.07 |
0.34* |
-0.05 |
-0.13 |
-0.01 |
-0.1 |
-0.65** |
P2 |
3.37** |
2.46** |
0.62** |
-0.2** |
-0.07 |
2.94** |
0.15 |
-1.38** |
-0.01 |
-0.39** |
-0.13 |
P3 |
-4.13** |
-2.04** |
-0.2** |
0.11** |
0.18** |
-2.73** |
1.63** |
1.32** |
0.07** |
0.54** |
0.42** |
P4 |
0.31 |
0.31 |
0.11 |
-0.05 |
-0.32** |
2.58** |
-0.23 |
-0.15 |
-0.01 |
-0.11 |
-0.13 |
P5 |
2.58** |
2.47** |
0.11 |
-0.02 |
-0.07 |
0.27 |
-1.79** |
-2.05** |
-0.14** |
-1.14** |
-0.2** |
P6 |
-1.43** |
-1.67** |
-0.52** |
0.14** |
0.24** |
-2.72** |
1.68** |
0.6** |
0.09** |
0.72** |
0.49** |
P7 |
0.23 |
0.29 |
0.5** |
-0.01 |
-0.25** |
0.32* |
-2.43** |
-0.25 |
-0.05** |
-0.11 |
-0.13 |
P8 |
-1.15** |
-2.08** |
-0.72** |
0.1** |
0.36** |
-0.99** |
1.03** |
2.04** |
0.07** |
0.59** |
0.31** |
SE gi |
0.23 |
0.17 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.16 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.01 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
*. ** Significant at 5% and 1% level of significance, respectively
Where,
P1 = Pusa Samaridhi P5 = Narendra Rashmi
P2 = Arka Bahar P6 = DBG-5
P3 = PSPL P7 = DBG-6
P4= Pant Lauki-3 P8 = Pusa Naveen
Table 3: Specific combining ability effects of hybrids for various characters under study in bottle gourd
Parents |
Days to initiation of first female flower |
Days to 50 % flowering |
No. of nodes at which first female flower |
Primary branches |
Vine length (m) |
Days to first fruit harvest |
Fruit length (cm) |
Fruit girth (cm) |
Fruit weight (kg) |
Marketable fruits per plant |
Total yield (kg) |
P1 x P2 |
-1.8* |
-4.53** |
-0.85** |
-0.04 |
0.36** |
-0.11 |
4.44** |
3.33** |
0.31** |
-0.03 |
0.51* |
P1 x P3 |
1.74* |
2.18** |
1.43** |
-0.21* |
-0.32* |
4.5** |
-0.08 |
-1.87** |
-0.31** |
-0.16 |
-0.81** |
P1 x P4 |
1.92** |
-3.04** |
-0.41 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
-2.94** |
-0.14 |
3.4** |
0.23** |
0.92** |
-0.43* |
P1 x P5 |
-2.17** |
-0.28 |
0.19 |
0.28** |
0.07 |
-2.34** |
-0.65 |
-0.47 |
0.02 |
-0.64** |
0.41* |
P1 x P6 |
4.04** |
5.57** |
0.64** |
-0.12 |
-0.15 |
1.69** |
-3.02** |
-5.12** |
-0.14** |
-0.27 |
-0.05 |
P1 x P7 |
0.51 |
-2.89** |
0.49* |
-0.43** |
0.25 |
0.72 |
1.19** |
0.57 |
0.04 |
0.99** |
0.64** |
P1 x P8 |
-1.34 |
5.12** |
0.32 |
-0.07 |
-0.3* |
2.89** |
-0.14 |
-0.93* |
-0.17** |
-1.38** |
-1.07** |
P2 x P3 |
-1.21 |
5.88** |
1.51** |
-0.57** |
0.07 |
3.8** |
-0.61 |
-3.69** |
-0.08* |
-1.54** |
-0.5* |
P2 x P4 |
-1.88* |
-1.44** |
-0.72** |
0.19* |
0.04 |
-2.21** |
1.02* |
3.44** |
0.08* |
0.04 |
0.75** |
P2 x P5 |
-2.88** |
-2.7** |
0.25 |
0.59** |
-0.01 |
2.12** |
0.06 |
1.74** |
0 |
1.21** |
0.22 |
P2 x P6 |
5.89** |
2.81** |
1.67** |
0.02 |
-0.42** |
0.95 |
-1.53** |
-0.88* |
-0.12** |
-0.12 |
0.03 |
P2 x P7 |
0.33 |
3.64** |
-0.21 |
0.48** |
-0.06 |
-0.78 |
-1.46** |
-2.05** |
-0.04 |
-0.09 |
0.28 |
P2 x P8 |
3.58** |
-0.22 |
1.01** |
-0.13 |
-0.44** |
2.19** |
-2.85** |
-0.38 |
-0.08* |
0.14 |
-0.99** |
P3 x P4 |
0.48 |
2** |
-0.01 |
0.01 |
0.29* |
-1.2* |
-0.89* |
-0.92* |
-0.1* |
-0.63** |
0 |
P3 x P5 |
-2.75** |
-2.36** |
1.83** |
0.15 |
-0.09 |
-0.67 |
-3.3** |
1.11** |
0.05 |
-0.06 |
-0.1 |
P3 x P6 |
-5.15** |
-7.62** |
-1.31** |
0.15 |
0.43** |
-6.91** |
6.23** |
5.29** |
0.36** |
2.15** |
1.41** |
P3 x P7 |
-1.38 |
1.38** |
0.51* |
-0.13 |
-0.34* |
1.53** |
-3.83** |
-2.78** |
-0.09* |
-1.12** |
-0.84** |
P3 x P8 |
-2.76** |
-2.88** |
-2.47** |
0.46** |
0.71** |
-4.06** |
6.61** |
6.35** |
0.36** |
2.17** |
1.79** |
P4 x P5 |
-1.46* |
-2.57** |
-0.28 |
-0.13 |
0.15 |
-0.64 |
1.43** |
-1.36** |
0.03 |
0.43* |
0.65** |
P4 x P6 |
-0.99 |
2.53** |
0.51* |
0.34** |
-0.33* |
5.51** |
0.06 |
-1.21** |
-0.04 |
-1.27** |
-0.57** |
P4 x P7 |
-1.75* |
-2.4** |
0.36 |
0.26** |
-0.06 |
3.42** |
2.27** |
3.68** |
0.1* |
1.43** |
-1.12** |
P4 x P8 |
1.67* |
-1.73** |
-0.09 |
0.05 |
-0.22 |
-1.17* |
-4.36** |
-3.38** |
-0.2** |
-0.18 |
0.61** |
P5 x P6 |
4.02** |
2.44** |
-0.65** |
0.34** |
-0.1 |
0.56 |
-1.18** |
-2.06** |
-0.01 |
-0.16 |
-0.44* |
P5 x P7 |
0.19 |
1.47** |
-0.8** |
0 |
0.45** |
1.52** |
-0.47 |
-0.45 |
-0.04 |
-0.34 |
0.65** |
P5 x P8 |
5.51** |
2.91** |
0.62** |
-0.18* |
0 |
3.86** |
0.93* |
0.2 |
-0.04 |
0.09 |
-1.49** |
P6 x P7 |
-2.11** |
-2.42** |
0.59** |
0 |
0.03 |
-2.83** |
-2.99** |
0.86* |
-0.06 |
-0.4* |
-0.27 |
P6 x P8 |
-7.55** |
-6.72** |
-1.82** |
-0.01 |
1.25** |
-4.12** |
7.93** |
4.83** |
0.37** |
1.97** |
1.52** |
P7 x P8 |
-1.12 |
0.19 |
1.64** |
0.08 |
0.14 |
3.22** |
-1.26** |
0.59 |
-0.02 |
-1.07** |
0.44* |
SE sij |
0.72 |
0.52 |
0.22 |
0.09 |
0.13 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.04 |
0.18 |
0.2 |
*. ** Significant at 5% and 1% level of significance, respectively
Where,
P1 = Pusa Samaridhi P5 = Narendra Rashmi
P2 = Arka Bahar P6 = DBG-5
P3 = PSPL P7 = DBG-6
P4= Pant Lauki-3 P8 = Pusa Naveen
Number of primary branches per vine is an important parameter for obtaining high fruit yield in crops like the bottle gourd. The present study of 28 bottle gourd crosses, the cross ‘PSPL X Pusa Naveen (P3 × P8) Narendra Rashmi x DBG-5 (P5 × P6) and Arka Bahar x Narendra Rashmi (P2 x P5) exhibited the high sca and mean performance for number of primary branches per vine. The sca variances of number of primary branches per vine were greater than those of gca suggesting the better role of non-additive genetic factors than that of additive action. Sharma et al.(1993) recorded similar results in bitter gourd in the cross ‘Pocha Seed x PSPL’. In these crosses, the parents, Narendra Rashmi, PSPL and Pusa Naveen exhibited good general combing ability for number of primary branches per vine. The predominant role of non-additive gene action for number of primary branches per vine was reported by Sirohi (1993) in bottle gourd. Per se and sca per formance for node number for first female flower appearance in the 28 crosses was favorable in Narendra Upcar x Suvarna (P5 x P8) followed by PSPL x Pusa Naveen (P3 x P8) and PSPL x DBG-5(P3 x P6). For this character, the sca variances were greater than those of gca suggesting the role of non-additive gene action. This is in agreement with the findings of Munshi and Sirohi (1994) in bitter gourd. Days taken to first female flower appearance is considered as one of the essential criteria for selecting for earliness in hybrids. Among the 28 bottle gourd crosses studied, the hybrid ‘Ambili x Pusa Vishwas (P1x P7)’ was identified as the best. However, the parents, Narendra Agrim, Kashi Harit and Punjab Samrat had favorable negative gca value. Neeraj Sharma et al.(2002) recorded similar results in bottle gourd. Sharma et al. (2002) in bottle gourd and Jha et al. (2009) in bottle gourd recorded the similar results. Fruit number per vine is a preferable trait for screening the hybrids for high yield. In these crosses, as the female parents DBG-5 (P6) and Pusa Naveen (P8) had already proved as a good general combiner for this trait. In bottle gourd, Uma Maheshwari and Hari Babu (2005) reported higher fruit number per vine in ten crosses and five parents in a partial diallele analysis wherein the cross ‘CM-45 x CM-14’ showed highest per se performance and sca for this trait.
Earliness in terms of days to first fruit harvest is an important criteria to select hybrids for commanding a premium price for fruits in the early markets. The cross combinations for days to first fruit harvest revealed that DBG-5 x Pusa Naveen (P6 x P8) followed by PSPL x Pusa Naveen (P3x P8) and PSPL x DBG-5 (P3 x P6) could be selected as the best performing hybrids as they proved their superiority through per se, and sca values. Similar trend of earliness was observed in ash gourd hybrids by Mandal et al.(2002). The crosses ‘Monsoon Miracle x Holly Green’ and ‘The largest x Indian Prime’ gave significant and negative sca for days to first harvest in bitter gourd (Pal et al., 1983).Vine length is an important parameter for obtaining high fruit yield in crops like the bottle gourd. Among the 28 hybrids of bottle gourd studied, the crosses DBG-5 x Pusa Naveen (P6 x P8), PSPL x Pusa Naveen (P3x P8) and PSPL x DBG-5 (P3 x P6) exhibited the high sca and mean performance for vine length. Sharma et al. (1993) recorded similar results in bitter gourd in the cross ‘Pocha Seed x PSPL’. The sca variances of vine length were greater than those of gca suggesting the better role of non-additive genetic factors than that of additive action. The predominant role of non- additive gene action for vine length was reported by Sirohi and Ghorui (1993) and Nisha (1999) in bottle gourd.
Fruit weight is a primary trait to be considered in any hybrid development programme, as, it directly contributes towards yield. In this study, of the 28 bottle gourd hybrids studied, highest fruit weight and sca effect was registered by Pusa Samridhi X Arka Bahar (P1 x P2) followed by PSPL x DBG-5 (P3 x P6) and DBG-5 x Pusa Naveen (P6 x P8). Higher fruit weight in hybrids was reported by Hegde (2009) in ridge gourd. However, lately, small-to medium-sized bottle gourd fruits of 1-2 kg weight each are preferred. Parent NR (P5) is a poor combiner, while the female parents were good combiner for fruit weight. Similar results were recorded by Rao et al.(2000) in ridge gourd. In the case of fruit size, the hybrid i.e. PSPL x DBG-5 (P3 x P6) was good combiner. The hybrid combinations PSPL x DBG-5 (P3 x P6), PSPL x Pusa Naveen (P3x P8) and DBG-5 x Pusa Naveen (P6 x P8) are proved its superiority in terms of high per se and sca also. These results were supported by Nisha (1999) in bottle gourd. For any hybrid seed development more seed number per fruit is favorable as it would reduce the cost of seed production. Expression of yield to the fullest potential of the crop is the prime trait to be considered in any hybridization programme. Based on per se performance and sca of hybrids, the crosses PSPL x Pusa Naveen (P3x P8) followed by DBG-5 x Pusa Naveen (P6 x P8) and PSPL x DBG-5 (P3 x P6) proved to be the best specific combiners for yield which proved their superiority through per se, gca and sca values. Choudhary et al. (2006) also justified similar results that the crosses MS1 x Punjab Sunheri and MS1 x Hara Madhu exhibited the highest sca effect and recorded the highest fruit yield per vine in muskmelon.
Evaluation of hybrids for per se and sca revealed that the cross PSPL x Pusa Naveen (P3x P8) was adjudged as the best hybrid, since it recorded the highest mean and sca effect for more number of traits of study viz., earliness in terms of early female flowering, fruit number per vine, days to 50% flowering days to first fruit harvest, fruit weight, fruit size, vine length, Moisture content and total yield per vine.
The next best hybrid, DBG-5 x Pusa Naveen (P6 x P8) could also be justified as the better combination through less node number for first female flower appearance, fruit number per vine, fruit weight, moisture content and fruit yield per vine.
REFERENCES
Allard, R. W. (1960). Principles of plant breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Chopra, R., & Kanwar, S. L. (1976). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi. p. 36.
Choudhary, B. R., Fageria, M. S., Pandey, Sudhakar, Rai, & Mathura (2006). Combining ability studies for economic attributes in muskmelon (Cucumismelo L.). Veg. Sci., 33(2), 185-187.
Jha, A., Pandey, S., Rai, M., Yadav, D. S., & Singh, T. B. (2009). Heterosis in relation to combining ability for flowering behaviors and yield parameters in bottle gourd. Veg. Sci., 36(3), 332-335.
Mandal, Joydip, Sirohi, P. S., & Behera, T. K. (2002). Genetical studies on flowering and fruit maturity in ash gourd [Benincasahispida (Thunb) Cogn.]. Orissa J. Hort., 30, 40-42.
Munshi, A. D., & Sirohi, P. S. (1994a). Combining ability estimates in bitter gourd (MomordicacharantiaL.). Veg Sci., 21(2), 132-136.
Nisha, S. K. (1999). Genetic studies in bottle gourd (CucurbitamoschataDuch.exPoir) through diallel analysis. M.Sc. (Hort.) Thesis, Tamilnadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
Pal, A. B., & Singh, H. (1983). Studies in hybrid. Vigour-II Notes on manifestation of hybrid vigour in brinjal and bitter gourd. Indian J. Genet.Plant Breeding. 6, 19-33.
Panse, V. G., & Sukhatme, P. V. (1978). Statistical methods for Agricultural workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
Rao, B. N., Rao, P. V., & Reddy, Y. N. (2000). Combining ability studies in ridge gourd (LuffaacutangulaRoxb. L.). Int. J. Trop. Agric., 18(2).
Richard, K. R. (1994). Line x tester analysis in bitter gourd. M.Sc. (Hort.) Thesis Tamilnadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
Roy, S. K. (1973). A simple and rapid method of estimation of total carotenoid pigment in mango. J. Food Sci. Tech., 10(1), 45.
Sharma, Neeraj, Sharma, N. K., & Malik, Y. S. (2002). Combining ability in long fruited bottle gourd. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 31(1&2), 79-82.
Sharma, N. K., Dhankhar, B. S., & Tewatia, A. S. (1993). Line x tester analysis for combining ability studies in bottle gourd – A note. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 22(4), 324-327.
Shivanand, H. (2009). Studies on Heterosis in ridge gourd. M.Sc. Thesis. Tamilnadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
Sirohi, P. S., & Ghorui, S. (1993). Gene effects of certain quantitative characters in bottle gourd. Veg. Sci., 20(2), 158-162.
Maheshwari, U., & HariBabu, K. (2005). combining ability for yield and its components in F3 generation of bottle gourd (Cucurbita moschata Duch. Ex Poir). Madras Agri. J. 92(4-6), 288-292.