Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2021, Volume : 9, Issue : 1
First page : (450) Last page : (456)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8534
Crossbreeding in Cattle: A Review
Deepti Kiran Barwa1* , Asit Jain2, Ashutosh Dubey3 and Aayush Yadav4
1,2Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding,
3,4Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Livestock Production College of Veterinary Science & A.H.,
Anjora, Durg, Chhattisgarh India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: deeptikiran03@gmail.com
Received: 10.12.2020 | Revised: 14.01.2021 | Accepted: 20.01.2021
ABSTRACT
The importance of crossbreeding in livestock species has been known for a long time; it has been used heavily in cattle to improve productivity for several decades. Crossbreeding allow to combine favorable characteristics from the breeds involved and to exploit heterosis. Crossbreeding system is of two types viz. terminal and continuous depending on retention of crossbred female in the herd or not. In cattle crossbreeding is mainly used to improve milk production in India while in tropics crossbreeding with zebu cattle is done to improve adoptability and disease resistant ability. The ideal exotic inheritance to be maintained in the indigenous cattle is 50% where there is scarcity of green fodder and 62.5% is suggested where there is adequate feed and fodder along with good marketing facilities. Though crossbreeding with exotic germplasm resulted in improves production and reproduction potential but it also resulted in dilution of indigenous livestock. Exotic breeds are more susceptible to tropical diseases, harsh climate and poor quality feed and fodder and as the crossbreds which required constant input of good managemental conditions in comparison to the native cattle. Therefore, it is advisable to use crossbreeding with caution based on tested bulls or semen, quality fodder and suitable breeds for particular region in India.
Keywords: Crossbreeding, Synthetic breeds, Inheritance.
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782
Cite this article: Barwa, D. K., Jain, A., Dubey, A., & Yadav, A. (2021). Crossbreeding in Cattle: A Review, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 9(1), 450-456. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8534
INTRODUCTION
The milk production in the country was 17.0 million tonnes during 1950-51 and has increased to 165.4 million tonnes in 2016-17. Also, the per capita availability of milk in 1950-51 was 130 gm/day and has increased to 355 gm/day in 2016-17. The indigenous and non-descript cattle contribute 11.3% and 9.5% respectively while exotic/crossbred contribute 25.4% to the total milk production in the country (BAHFS, DAHD & F, AHS series-18). Among numbers of initiative under-taken by the government for improving the productivity of milk over the period; crossbreeding was the major step. Crossbreeding is systematic mating system of two or more well defined breeds within the same species.
The history of crossbreeding in India dates as far back as 1875 when William Taylor, the Commissioner of Patna Division started an industrial institution by raising public fund. Taylor breed was developed by crossing Shorthorn cattle with local cow (Sinha, 1951). Later in 1934, a new bred called –“Jersindh” was developed by crossing Jersey and Red Sindhi at Military Dairy farm, Allahabad and at Bangalore by crossing Jersey and Tharparkar a new breed “Jerthar” was developed ( Wakchaure et al.,2015). In 1963, at Kerala using Brown Swiss and Jersey (5/8) on local Non- descript cows and a new breed of cattle “Sunandini” was developed (Chacko, 1994). Since then, many breeds of cattle were developed and some are well known for their milk production.
Crossbreeding is the most effective and rapid approach for genetically improving the non-descript zebu cattle population by crossing with exotic dairy cattle breeds particularly in milk shed areas around peri-urban and industrial towns. In these areas there are good marketing facilities for milk and milk products and also green fodder and quality feed are present around the year. Crossbreeding experiences with exotic dairy cattle breeds like Holstein Friesian, Brown Swiss and Jersey has proved that there is rapid genetic improvement in the non-descript cattle and marked improvement in productivity. Holstein Friesian cattle have been recommended as the breed of choice in the irrigated plains and Jersey cattle as breed of choice in hilly terrain and coastal areas for crossbreeding. Exotic inheritance in crossbred cattle should be maintained in between 50 and 62.5%. Beyond this exotic inheritance the crossbred acquires the problem of adoptability and other diseases like mastitis, milk fever, FMD etc.
Reasons of crossbreeding-
The reason for crossbreeding is to increase the overall efficiency of a production system through crossing breeds which have their genetic merits in different traits and to produce individual dairy cattle with intermediate performance between that of two more extreme parent breeds (Simm, 2000). One of the most important reasons of crossbreeding is to obtain benefits of heterosis. Heterosis is highest in first generation and then reduced to half in the second generation, so it is advisable that the F1 crossbred females should be bred with genetically superior progeny-tested crossbred males having exotic inheritance between 50 and 75% (Sreenivas, 2013). Crossbreeding mostly done in animals due to-
System of crossbreeding
A planned crossbreeding definitely increases the production. There are many crossbreeding system which can be used for genetic improvement in animals depending on types of heterosis required (direct or maternal) number of breeds to be used in crossbreeding and whether or not replacement females are produced or purchased. On the basis of whether or not replacement females are produced or purchased crossbreeding is of mainly two types- (A) Terminal and (B) Rotational crossbreeding system.
Synthetic Bos taurus x Bos indicus breeds
Synthetic breeds are made up of two or more component breeds, and are designed to benefit from hybrid vigour without crossing with other breeds (Bourdon, 2000). Many attempts have been made to develop new synthetic breeds by crossing Bos taurus and Bos indicus in India and as well as in abroad. Cunningham and Syrstad (1987) describe two methods: the first method involves two parental breeds which are mated to produce the F1 generation. The F1 individuals are selected to undergo inter se mating to produce the F2 generation. The same process is repeated in subsequent generations (Figure 1). In second method three breeds could produce a synthetic with 25 percent local genes (B. indicus), 25 percent from one of the B. taurus breeds and 50 percent B. taurus genes from a second exotic animal.
The most important that should be remembered for successful development of synthetic breed is genetic soundness. Genetic soundness involves the appropriate choice of breeds and breeds composition; requires large population to avoid inbreeding and adequate breeding programme based on progeny testing.
Australian Milking Zebu
Australian Milking Zebu (AMZ) was developed by CSIRO in Badgery’s Creek, northern New South Wales. It was developed by crossing Sahiwal/ Red Sindhi and Jersey. This breed was evolved for combining high milk production ability and heat tolerance ability. AMZ cows have Age at first calving 30months, 1987 kg milk yield in 244 lactation length (McDowell, 1985).
Australian Friesian Sahiwal
The government of Queensland, Australia develops one of the successful synthetic breeds: the 50:50 Sahiwal:Friesian - Australian Friesian Sahiwal (AFS) (Galukande et al., 2013). Emphasis was on milk yield and tick resistance. The programme was intiated in 1961 by crossing Sahiwal with Bos taurus dairy breeds, but only the Friesian crosses were retained. Same breeding programme was used as in AMZ. The AFS was bred for milk letdown, tick resistance and milk yield. Under extensive grazing on tropical pastures, the AFS averaged 2556 litres of milk and 105 kg of fat, which compares favourably with the HF performance of 2291 litres of milk and 82 kg of fat (Alexander, 1986).
Brazilian Milking Hybrid
The Brazilian Milking Hybrid was the result of a research and development programme conducted by the National Dairy Cattle Centre of the Federal Research Organization of Brazil with the assistance of Food and Agriculture Organization’s United Nations Development Programme (FAO/UNDP). Its main objective was to obtain estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations on the dairy, reproduction, growth and adaptation traits needed to design breeding programmes for synthetic dairy cattle breeds suitable for the dairy production system of Brazilian tropics (Madalena, 2002).
Girlando
Another synthetic breed is the Girolando, composed of 62.5% HF and 37.5% Gir developed in Brazil. The Girolando produces 80 percent of the milk in Brazil and is characterized by an average of 3600 kg of milk with 4 percent fat content, and has a CI of 410 days (Girolando Associacao Brasileira Dos Criadores de Girolando, 2005).
Jamaica Hope
This is the earliest synthetic breed developed for dairy purpose in Jamaica in Hope farm. It is composed of 80% Jersey inheritance, 15% Sahiwal and 5% Holiestien –Friesian inheritance. It is characterized by 34.5 months age at first calving is with 2930kg milk yield and calving interval 439 days (Galukande et al., 2013).
Some of the synthetic breeds that are developed in India by crossing Bos indicus and Bos taurus breeds.
Crossbred |
Place where developed |
Utility |
Exotic breed |
Indigenous breed |
Exotic inheritance |
Taylor |
Patna |
Dairy |
Shorthorn |
Non-descript |
|
Jarsindh |
Allahabad |
Dairy |
Jersey |
Red Sindhi |
62.5%, |
Jerthar |
Bangalore |
Dairy |
Jersey |
Tharparkar |
50%, |
Sunandini |
Kerela |
Dairy |
Brown Swiss |
Non-descript |
62.5%, |
Frieswal |
Merut |
Dairy |
Holstein Friesian |
Sahiwal |
50%, |
Karan Fries |
Karnal |
Dairy |
Holstein Friesian |
Tharparkar |
50%, |
Karan Swiss |
Karnal |
Dairy |
Brown Swiss |
Sahiwal and |
50%, |
Advantages of crossbreeding
The crossbreeding mating system is used as a tool to improve productivity through heterosis and breed complementarity to match genetic resources with feed resources, climate, management levels and markets. In crossbreeding through favorable heterosis in many traits of economic importance has benefited the breeders, besides these other advantages of crossbreeding are (Gosey, 1991)–
Disadvantages or limitation of crossbreeding
Though crossbreeding has given very impressive results it is seen that crossbred cannot perform well at the field level. Some the disadvantages are listed below-
Future Prospects of Crossbreeding
New technology and system in past decades has given a good outcome in the improvement of dairy cattle. Systematic breeding strategies should be followed consistently for profitable crossbreeding. Artificial insemination is the most conventional method through which crossbreeding can be fasten. This requires the selection of bulls i.e. progeny tested bulls to have faster genetic improvement. Females should also be selected for adoptive traits and fitness traits. Selection of both male and female will lead to faster improvement, but the descript breeds should not used in crossbreeding. The use of sexed semen can also quicken the improvement through crossbreeding.
CONCLUSION
Crossbreeding is an effective tool for improving production and productivity of zebu cattle. Depending on the objective of crossbreeding, system of crossbreeding should be used in order to have good outcome. The F1 progeny shows high degree of heterosis which then start to deteriorate in the coming progeny generations. However this problem can be overcome by developing synthetic breed and continuous production of F1, which requires large population of the pure breed to avoid inbreeding. Maintenance of synthetic breed requires proper recording and use of progeny tested bulls. For sustainable production there should be planned breeding policy along with availability of progeny tested bulls.
REFERENCES
Alexander, G. I. (1986). Australia’s tropical dairy breed. Ag China Conference, Guangzhou, China, P. 402–406.
Bourdon, R. (2000). Understanding animal breeding, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle Valley River, New Jersey.
Chacko, C. T. (1994). Developments of the Sunandini cattle breed in India. World Animal Review (FAO), no (80/81), p 71-91.
Galukande, E., Mulindwa, H., Wurzinge, M., Roschinsky, R., Mwai, A. O., & Solkner, J. (2013). Cross-breeding cattle for milk production in the tropics: achievements, challenges and opportunities. Animal Genetic Resources, 52, 111–125. doi:10.1017/S2078633612000471
Gosey, J. A. (1991). Crossbreeding systems and the theory behind composite breeds. Range Beef Cow Symposium. 236. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/rangebeefcowsymp/236
Hansen, L. B. (2006). Monitoring the worldwide genetic supply for dairy cattle with emphasis on managing crossbreeding and inbreeding. 8th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production, August 13-18, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Heins, B., Hansen, L., & Seykora, F. (2007). The California experience of mating Holstein cows to A.I. sires from the Swedish Red, Norwegian Red, Montbeliarde, and Normande breeds. University of Minnesota, department of animal science, dairy cattle research; crossbreeding of dairy cattle. http://www.ansci.umn.edu/research/California%20update%202007-kg.pdf
Madalena, F. E. (2002). Bos indicus breeds and Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses. Dairy Animals. Elsvier Science Ltd. 576.
McAllister, A. J. (2002). Is crossbreeding the answer to questions of dairy breed utilization? J. Dairy Sci. 85, 2352-2357.
McDowell, R. E. (1985). Crossbreeding in tropical areas with emphasis on milk, health, and fitness. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 2418–2435.
Sinha, B. N. (1951). Taylor cows of Patna. Indian Veterinary Journal.27, 272-276.
Simm, G. (2000). Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep, 64-65, 70, 74-79, 83-95, 134-135, 201, 244-247, 354-355. Farming press. CABI International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
Sørensen, M. K., Norberg, E., Pedersen, J., & Christensen, L. G. (2008). Invited review: Crossbreeding in dairy cattle: A Danish perspective. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 4116-4128.
Sreenivas, D. (2013). Breeding policy strategies for genetic improvement of cattle and buffaloes in India. Vet. World 6(7), 455-460.