Archives

Groundnut is popularly known as ‘king of oilseeds’, ‘wonder nut’ and ‘poor man’s cashew’. They are excellent plant based source of protein and high in various vitamins, minerals and plant compounds.

It contains 25.2 percent of protein, 48.2 percent of oil, 11.5 percent of starch, 4.5 percent of soluble sugar, 2.1 percent of crude fibre and 6.0 percent of moisture.
India is the second largest groundnut producer in the world. India shares 22 per cent of groundnut production in the world. Area under groundnut cultivation in India is 7 million ha. Production and productivity of groundnut is 8.5 million tonnes and 1.2 million tonnes/ha respectively. In Tamil Nadu, area under groundnut cultivation is 3,72,023 ha out of which 70 percent of groundnut is grown in rain-fed condition and 30 percent of groundnut is grown in irrigated condition. In Tamil Nadu, area under groundnut cultivation is 3,72,023 ha out of which 70 percent of groundnut grown in rainfed condition and 30 percent of groundnut grown in irrigated condition. Production is 9,31,671 tonnes and productivity is 2.50 tonnes/ha. Majority of groundnut area is covered in North eastern zones (Cuddalore, Villupuram, Thriuvannamalai, Vellore, Kancheepuram, Tiruvallur and Ariyalur districts).
In this context, the present study was conducted with the specific objectives as follows.
1. To assess the extent of adoption of improved ground nut varieties and technologies.
2. To assess the socio economic impacts of improved groundnut varieties and technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu state. Cuddalore was purposively selected as it has more area under groundnut cultivation (11,100 ha). Oilseed research station is present in Virudhachalam in Cuddalore district through which farmers were able to know about new varieties and technologies. Cuddalore district consist of seven taluks and thirteen blocks. Among those blocks, four blocks were purposively selected for this study viz., Kurinjipadi, Cuddalore, Parangipettai and Virudhachalam. Three villages from each block were selected. Total sample size of 120 respondents of groundnut growers were selected using proportionate sampling method (n=120).
By reviewing the relevant literature and consulting with experts and scientists 18 recommended practices were chosen for the adoption test. The dichotomous responses such as ‘adopted’ and ‘non-adopted’ were given by farmers. Based on this scores 1 and 2 were provided for responses ‘adopted’ and ‘non-adopted’ respectively. Scoring procedure followed by Jayabalan (2002) was used.

Impact study is a research conducted to observe and understand the effects of introduction of a varieties and technologies. Majority of the farmers adopted TNAU released varieties and technologies which resulted in impacts on farmers in all aspects. Three types of impacts viz., economic impacts, social impacts and personal impacts were analysed in this study. The impact was calculated with two point continuum scale viz., agree and disagree with score value of 2 and 1. The mean scale was calculated for each impact and same was ranked based on the weightage mean score. Scoring procedure followed by Akila (2015) was used.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1: Extent of adoption of improved groundnut varieties (n=120)

Table 2: Distribution of respondents according to the extent of adoption of TNAU recommended groundnut technologies/ practices. (n=120)

 

From the table 1, it could be found that 80 percent of groundnut growers have adopted TNAU released groundnut varieties viz., VRI 2, VRI 8, TMV 10 and CO 7 Remaining 20 percent of groundnut growers adopted other varieties. Majority of the groundnut growers in the research area adopted VRI 2 variety (72.5%) followed by GG 7 (11.66%), VRI 8 (8.33%), JL 24 (6.66%) and K 6 (4.16%), CO 7 (0.83%), TMV 10 (0.83%) and WESTERN 44 (0.83%). This might be due to the fact that the yield and oil content of TNAU released groundnut varieties was high. Adoption of VRI 2 was found to be high compared to other varieties.

         

From the table 2, it is found that all the farmers have adopted recommended soil type and season of sowing in time (100%). Majority of groundnut growers had adopted spacing (95.8%), seed rate (97.5%), recommended NPK application (98.3%), gypsum application (88.3%), border irrigation (89.2%) and control measure of tobacco caterpillar (80.8). Sixty to seventy five percent of the groundnut growers adopted NSKE per cent spray for tobacco caterpillar (66.7%), chemicals spray for control of red hairy caterpillar (71.7%) and cultivated pulses and oilseeds as intercrop (75.8%). More than half of the respondents (55.8%) involved in value addition of their produce viz., groundnut oil and oilcake. More than one third of the respondents adopted control measures of the diseases of rust (40.8%), late leaf spot (35.0%), seed treatment (38.3%) and weedicide application (46.7%). One fourth of the respondents adopted the other technologies namely control of pod borer practices (26.7%), ZnSo4 application (24.2%) and TNAU Mn mixture application (27.5%). Other technologies viz., application of TNAU groundnut rich (6.7%), borax application (11.7%), NPV against red hairy caterpillar (3.3%), trap crop (8.3%), control measure of bud necrosis (5.8%) and termite (0.8%). None of the groundnut growers of the study area had not adopted mulching, virus control measures, biofertilizer application and value added products viz., groundnut milk and peanut butter.

         

Table 3: Distribution of the respondents according to their overall adoption of TNAU released groundnut varieties and recommended technologies/ practices.

         

 

With the respect to the adoption level of the groundnut growers, it was observed from the table 3 that 11.7 percent of the respondents belonged to the low adoption level category while 75.8 percent of the respondents belonged to medium adoption level and 12.5 percent of the respondents belonged to the high adoption level. Asaithambi (2003) who reported that majority of respondents had medium level adoption.

Table 4: Impacts of adoption of TNAU released groundnut varieties and recommended technologies/ practices

 

It could be observed from the table that there was six economic impacts, three social impacts and six personal impacts expressed by the groundnut growers due to the adoption of TNAU released groundnut varieties and recommended technologies/ practices.
Out of six economic impacts, increase in yield ranked first and second with the weightage score 1.75 followed by investment on other farming practices, increased saving, repaid debt and purchase of additional land with the weightage mean score of  1.70, 1.28 , 1.18 and 0.45 respectively. Increased income was possible because of adoption of improved varieties VRI 2, VRI 8, GG 7, JL 24, WESTERN 44, CO 7 and TMV 10 which enabled them to obtain increased yield compare to local varieties.
Three different social impacts were noticed among the respondents. They were able to increase their organisational participation which ranked first with mean weightage score of 1.78 followed by able to became opinion leader and obtain social recognition with mean weightage score 1.05 and 0.83 respectively.
With the respect to the personal impacts, there were six personal impacts reported by the respondents. Increased outside contact was ranked first with mean score value 1.98 followed by increased consultation with fellow farmers, increased confidence level and increased decision making ability with mean weightage score value of 1.95, 1.86 and 1.83 respectively. Other impacts were they had an opportunities to know and experienced about latest technologies and able to subscribe farm journal.

CONCLUSION

It could be concluded that majority of the respondents have adopted improved varieties compared to local varieties. Out of these improved varieties, TNAU released groundnut varieties are highly preferred due to their higher yield and oil content. With respect to the technologies, certain technologies viz., soil type, season of sowing in time, seed rate, NPK application, trap crop, red hairy caterpillar control measures and bud necrosis control measures were highly adopted by the respondents. Hence it is suggested that efforts should be taken to promote those technologies that have not reached the farming community through extension wing of Universities, KVK and also through Department of Agriculture by using group approach and individual approach viz., on farm demonstrations, trials, field days and meetings etc.
Increased income and increased yield were expressed as economic impacts which were ranked first and second among the economic impacts. Increased organisational participation ranked first among the social impacts and increased outside contact ranked first among the personal impacts. It could be concluded that all the impacts reported by the groundnut growers were found to be desirable impacts.

REFERENCES

Asaithambi, K. (1981). A study on the knowledge & adoption behaviour of groundnut growing farmers. Unpub. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TNAU, Madurai.
Sonawane, K. J., Pokharkar, V. G., & Guluva, C. M. (2015). Impact of improved production technology of groundnut on farm productivity and income in Western Maharastra. Journal of oilseeds research. 33(2), 138-145.
Markana, J. G., (2016). Technological gap inadoption of improved cultivation practices by kharif groundnut growers. International journal of agricultural sciences. 8(25), 1583-1585.
Shuaibu, H. (2018). Adoption and impact of improved groundnut seed varieties among groundnut farmers: case of Albasu local government area of Kanno state, Nigeria. Journal of basic and applied science. 26(1), 132-140.
Ramapadmaja, T., & Umamaheshwararao. (2019). Impact of technology on groundnut production of the Chittoor District. International journal of recent technology and engineering. 8(154), 933-938.