Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2021, Volume : 9, Issue : 1
First page : (99) Last page : (107)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8544
Isolation, Characterization and Identification of Efficient Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from Different Chickpea Growing Areas of Karnataka
Dakshayini, G.*, Anantha Rama, A., Arunkumar Pandit., Muthuraju, R., Narayanaswamy, B, and Nagaraju, K.
Dept. of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences,
GKVK, Bengaluru – 560 065, Karnataka, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: dakshayinig1492@gmail.com
Received: 13.12.2020 | Revised: 16.01.2021 | Accepted: 24.01.2021
ABSTRACT
Chickpea is an important pulse crop extensively grown in different parts of the world. India is the largest producer of chickpea whereas in Karnataka northern Karnataka has larger area under chickpea cultivation compared to southern regions of Karnataka. Phosphorus is the key element required in the nutrition of plants next to the nitrogen and these days phosphatic fertilizers are becoming costly and less available. In this context, an attempt was made to isolate and characterize the efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) from different areas of south Karnataka. Four different soil samples were collected from Arasikere, Chamarajanagara, Mysore and Devanahalli. PSB were isolated using Pikovskaya’s media and total of twenty four isolates were obtained. Based on zone of solubilization ten isolates were selected for screening process and from the result of screening tests three best isolates were identified by their morphological and biochemical characteristics as described in Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. From 16SrRNA sequencing, the top three most efficient PSB isolates were identified as Bacillus licheniformis(ACP-3), Arthrobacter sp. HPG166 (ACP-2) and Pseudomonas chlororaphis (CCP-2). “Bacillus licheniformis” was the best isolate which was further tested under field condition with different fertilizer levels of SSP and rock phosphate
Keywords: PSB, Isolation, Characterization, Identification
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782
Cite this article: Dakshayini, G, Anantha Rama, A., Arunkumar P., Muthuraju, R., Narayanaswamy, B., & Nagaraju, K. (2021). Isolation, Characterization and Identification of Efficient Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from Different Chickpea Growing Areas of Karnataka, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 9(1), 99-107. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8544
INTRODUCTION
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important pulse crop, also known as Bengal gram, simply gram in English. Chickpea is originated in Western Asia. Although it is predominantly consumed as a pulse its flour is used in the preparation of variety of sweets and condiments. Phosphorus (P) is known as the ‘energy currency’ as it is associated with the several vital functions of life and P is the key element in the nutrition of plants next to the nitrogen.
Phosphorus exists in nature in a variety of organic and inorganic forms. P availability can be very low in soil, because of its fixation as insoluble phosphates of aluminum, calcium and iron. Since P deficiency is the most important key limiting factor restricting the plant growth, chemical phosphate fertilizers are widely used to increase crop yields, where soluble forms of P fertilizer used are easily precipitated as insoluble form, which leads to excessive and repeated application of P fertilizers (Alam et al. 2002).
Phosphorus solubilizing activity is carried out by a large number of saprophytic bacteria and fungi through various microbial processes or mechanisms including organic acid production and proton extrusion (Karpagam and Nagalakshmi, 2014). Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) play a significant role in making phosphorus available to plants by bringing about favorable changes in soil reaction in the soil microenvironment leading to solubilization of inorganic phosphate sources. Some microorganisms associated with different pant rhizosphere are able to solubilize inorganic insoluble P salts. Pseudomonas and Bacillus are two important genera of soil bacteria with promising activity of phosphate solubilization (Reyes et al.,1999; Yadav and Tarafdar, 2011).
Root development, stem, branches, flower and seed formation, crop maturity and quality crop production, and also resistance to plant diseases are the attributes associated with phosphorus nutrition. In the recent years, the cost of chemical fertilizers especially phosphatic fertilizers is increasing which is away from reach of small farmers in the developing countries like India. This has led to the finding of alternative ways for supplying the P to the crop plants in a cost effective way. One such way is development and use of phosphorus solubilizing biofertilizers.
India is the largest producer of Chickpea in the world, contributing around 70 per cent of the world’s production occupying an area of 9.01million hectares with the production of 7.58 million tones and productivity of 841 kg/ha. In Karnataka northern Karnataka has larger area under chick pea compared to southern Karnataka, Dharwad, Gadag, Gulbarga, Bidar, Yadgiri, Bellary, Raichur and Davanagere are the major Chickpea growing districts in Karnataka. In this point of view the present experiment was conducted for the isolation and characterization of efficient PSB from different chickpea growing areas of Southern parts of Karnataka
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The evaluation of efficient phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on growth and yield of Chickpea was done at GKVK, Bengaluru. The laboratory experiments were conducted in the Department of Agricultural Microbiology, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru.
Sample collection
Soil samples were collected from different Chickpea growing areas like Arasikere, Chamarajanagara, Mysore and Devanahalli. Samples were collected at the depth of 0-15cm and brought to lab in polythene bags. The collected soil samples were subjected for the isolation of phosphate solubilizing bacteria.
Media preparation
The Pikovskaya’s medium was used for the isolation of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria. Medium composition for one liter : Glucose 10g, Tricalcium phosphate(TCP) 5g, Ammonium sulphate 0.5g, Sodium chloride 0.2g, Magnesium sulphate 0.1g, Potassium chloride 0.2g, Yeast extract 0.5g, Manganese sulphate and Ferrous sulphate in trace amounts, Agar 15g, distilled water one liter and pH adjusted to neutral. The media was sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 minutes and cooled to 50 °C.
Isolation of phosphate solubilizing bacteria
PSB were isolated from each sample by serial dilution and spread plate method. One gram of soil sample was suspended in 9ml sterilized distilled water blank and shaken thoroughly which gives 10-1 dilution. From this solution again 1ml is transferred into 9ml sterile water blank to obtain 10-2 dilution. Similarly 10-3, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6 and 10-7 dilutions were made for each sample. 0.1 ml of the aliquot was spread on the Petri dish containing Pikovskaya’s agar medium (Sonam et al., 2011) and the plates incubated at 28±2 °C. After 2-3 days of incubation, colonies forming halo zones were selected and subcultured on Pikovskaya’s agar medium for further characterization study.
Purification of PSB isolates.
All the PSB isolates were purified on Pikovskaya’s medium. The colonies that form clear halo zones were selected and purified by streak plate method and preserved on agar slants for further screening and characterization.
Biochemical characterization of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria
All the selected isolates were examined for the colony morphology, cell shape, Gram reaction and subjected to different biochemical tests as detailed below.
Biochemical tests
Gram staining
All the bacterial cultures were examined for colony morphology, cell shape and size, Gram reaction and ability to form spores as per the standard procedures given by Barthalomew (1950).
Gelatin liquefaction
The gelatin liquefaction ability of the bacterial isolates was determined by following the procedure given by Blazevic and Ederer (1975). To the pre sterilized gelatin agar plates, the test cultures were inoculated and incubated at 30 °C for three days. After incubation, the culture plates were flooded with 12% HgCl2 and allowed for 20 minutes. Clear zone around the growth of organism was taken as positive for gelatin liquefaction.
Catalase test (Blezevic and Ederer, 1975)
Nutrient agar slants were inoculated with test culture and were incubated at 30 °C for 24 hr. After incubation the tubes were flooded with one ml of three per cent hydrogen peroxide and observed for production of gas bubbles. The occurrence of gas bubble was taken as positive for catalase activity.
Starch hydrolysis
The ability of the isolates to hydrolysis was examined by the procedure of Eckfod (1927). Petri plates containing two per cent starch agar were inoculated with test cultures and incubated at 30 °C for three days. After incubation the plates were flooded with Lugol’s iodine solution and allowed for 15-20 minutes. The clear zone around the colony was considered as positive.
Urease test (James and Natalie, 1992).
The urease activities of the bacterial isolates were determined by inoculating the cultures to five ml of pre-sterilized urea broth containing phenol red as pH indicator. The tubes were incubated for 24 to 48 hours at 30 °C. The formation of dark pink color was taken as positive for urease activity.
Citrate utilization test (James and Natalie, 1992).
Bacterial isolates were streaked on citrate agar slants containing bromo-thymol blue as indicator and incubated overnight at room temperature. After incubation slants were observed for the formation of blue color in the medium and it was taken as positive for the citrate utilization test.
Oxidase test
The isolates to be tested were spotted on the trypticase soya agar plates and incubated for 24 hours at 28 ± 2 °C. After incubation, two to three drops of tetra methyl phenylene diamine dihydrochloride was added to the growth surface of the test organism. The color changed to maroon was taken as oxidase positive.
Hydrogen sulphide production (Cowan and Steel, 1970)
Tubes containing SIM agar were sterilized. The sterilized tubes were stabbed with the test cultures. The tubes were incubated for 48 hours at 28 ± 2 °C. After incubation, the development of black color along the line of the stab was noted and considered as positive for the test.
Molecular characterization of efficient PSB isolates
After screening, the most promising three pure cultures of PSB isolates were sent to Macrogen institute (South Korea) for 16SrRNA sequencing.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Isolation of PSB from the soils of Chickpea growing areas
A total of ten isolates were selected from four different soil samples collected from different Chickpea growing areas of southern parts of Karnataka. The details of population of PSB are given in Table 1. The population of PSB ranged from 11×106 to 23×106 cfu per gram of soil. All the four soil samples showed the presence of PSB (with solubilizing zones). The highest PSB population was found in Arasikere sample where as the lowest in Devanahalli. Even though PSB population was found in Devanahalli sample high zone of solubilization was not observed. Therefore, based on the zone of solubilization and results of screening tests three most efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria were selected for the further biochemical characterization and identification process.
Characterization of efficient PSB based on biochemical tests
The three most efficient PSB isolates were identified up to generic level based on morphological and biochemical characteristics as described in the Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Holt et al., 1994). The results obtained are furnished in Table 2 and 3 respectively. Out of three isolates, ACP-3 was the best efficient P solubilizer, it was identified as Bacillus, and other two organisms were ACP-2 and CCP-2 which were identified as Arthrobacter and Pseudomonas respectively. The occurrence of Bacillus as the predominant genus in the many soil has been reported (Vikram, 2001; Elliot and Lynch, 1985) and its predominance could be due to the versatility of the genus to use different substrates as nutrient source. The occurrence of Psuedomonas sp., Bacillus sp., Enterobacter aerogenes and Vibrio proteolyticus in the rhizosphere earlier as mineral phosphate solubilizers (Guar et al., 1973; Nair and Subba Rao, 1975; Illmer and Schinner, 1992; Thakkar et al., 1993; Vazquez et al., 2000) and the results of the present investigation are in line with these reports. The PSB were found to belong to the genera Arthrobacter (ACP-2), Bacillus (ACP-3) and Pseudomonas (CCP-2).
Molecular characterization of efficient PSB isolates
From 16SrRNA sequencing, the top three PSB isolates were identified as Bacillus licheniformis(ACP-3), Arthrobacter sp. HPG166 (ACP-2) and Pseudomonas chlororaphis (CCP-2). “Bacillus licheniformis” was the best isolate which was furthur tested under field condition with different fertilizer levels of SSP and rock phosphate.
16SrRNA SEQUENCING AND DENDOGRAM OF EFFICIENT PSB ISOLATES
16SrRNA sequencing result of isolate ACP-2 (Arthrobacter sp. HPG166)
>150518-27_A07_ACP-2_785F.ab1711
16srRNA sequencing result of isolate ACP-3 (Bacillus licheniformis)
>150518-27_M07_NB_isolateACP-3_785F.ab1703
16SrRNA sequencing result of isolate CCP-2 (Pseudomonas chlororaphis)
>150518-27_A07_CCP-2_785F.ab1711
GATTGAACGCTGGCGGCAGGCCTAACACATGCAAGTCGAGCGGTAGAGAGGTGCTTGCACCTCTTGAGAGCGGCGGACGGGTGAGTAATGCCTAGGAATCTGCCTGGTAGTGGGGGATAACGTCCGGAAACGGACGCTAATACCGCATACGTCCTACGGGAGAAAGCAGGGGACCTTCGGGCCTTGCGCTATCAGATGAGCCTAGGTCGGATTAGCTAGTTGGTGAGGTAATGGCTCACCAAGGCGACGATCCGTAACTGGTCTGAGAGGATGATCAGTCACACTGGAACTGAGACACGGTCCAGACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTGGGGAATATTGGACAATGGGCGAAAGCCTGATCCAGCCATGCCGCGTGTGTGAAGAAGGTCTTCGGATTGTAAAGCACTTTAAGTTGGGAGGAAGGGTACTTACCTAATACGTGAGTATTTTGACGTTACCGACAGAATAAGCACCGGCTAACTCTGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACAGAGGGTGCAAGCGTTAATCGGAATTACTGGGCGTAAAGCGCGCGTAGGTGGTTCGTTAAGTTGGATGTGAAATCCCCGGGCTCAACCTGGGAACTGCATCCAAAACTGGCGAGCTAGAGTATGGTAGAGGGTGGTGGAATTTCCTGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATAGGAAGGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGACCACCTGGACTGATACTGACACTGAGGTGCGAAAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGTCAACTAGCCGTTGGGAGCCTTGAGCTCTTAGTGGCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGTTGACCGCCTGGGGAGTACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAATGAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCAGGCCTTGACATCCAATGAACTTTCCAGAGATGGATTGGTGCCTTCGGGAACATTGAGACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGTAACGAGCGCAACCCTTGTCCTTAGTTACCAGCACGTTATGGTGGGCACTCTAAGGAGACTGCCGGTGACAAACCGGAGGAAGGTGGGGATGACGTCAAATCATCATGGCCCTTACGGCCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGGTCGGTACAGAGGGTTGCCAAGCCGCGAGGTGGAGCTAATCCCACAAAACCGATCGTAGTCCGGATCGCAGTCTGCAACTCGACTGCGTGAAGTCGGAATCGCTAGTAATCGCGAATCAGAATGTCGCGGTGAATACGTTCCCGGGCCTTGTACACACCGCCCGTCACACCATGGGAGTGGGTTGCACCAGAAGTAGCTAGTCTAACCTTCGGGAGGACGGTTACCACGGTGTGATTCATGACTGGGGTGAAGTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTAGGGGAACCTGCGTable 1: Population of phosphorus solubilising bacteria in the soil from different Chickpea growing areas
Sl. No. |
Locations |
Sample code |
PSB population (cfu×106/g soil) |
Number of isolates obtained |
Isolates selected for screening |
1 |
Arasikere |
ACP |
23×106 |
7 |
ACP-1 |
ACP-2 |
|||||
ACP-3 |
|||||
ACP-4 |
|||||
2 |
Chamarajanagara |
CCP |
21×106 |
6 |
CCP-2 |
CCP-3 |
|||||
CCP-3 |
|||||
3 |
Mysore |
MCP |
16×106 |
6 |
MCP-1 |
MCP-2 |
|||||
MCP-3 |
|||||
4 |
Devanahalli |
DCP |
11×106 |
5 |
- |
5 |
Total |
- |
- |
24 |
10 |
Note: ACP - Arasikere Chickpea PSB
CCP- Chamarajanagara Chickpea PSB
Table 2: Morphological and biochemical characterization of the efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria
Sl. No. |
Isolates |
Morphological characters |
|||
Colony characters |
Gram reaction |
Shape and size |
Endospore staining |
||
1 |
ACP-2 |
Creamy white, smooth, widely spreading |
+ve |
Rod, small |
- |
2 |
ACP-3 |
Orange, widely spreading, |
+ve |
Rod, large |
+ |
3 |
CCP-2 |
White, slimy, widely spreading, |
-ve |
Ellipsoidal, large |
- |
Table 3: Biochemical characterization of the efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria
Sl. No. |
Isolates |
Biochemical tests |
Genus |
||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|||
1 |
ACP-2 |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
Arthrobacter |
2 |
ACP-3 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Bacillus |
3 |
CCP-2 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Pseudomonas |
1-Gelatin liquefaction, 2- Catalase test, 3- Starch hydrolysis, 4- Urease test, 5- Citrate utilization test, 6- Oxidase test, 7- Hydrogen sulphide test
Table 4: Molecular characterization of the efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria
Sl. No. |
Efficient PSB isolates |
Organism identified |
1 |
ACP-2 |
Arthrobacter sp. HPG166 |
2 |
ACP-3 |
Bacillus licheniformis |
3 |
CCP-2 |
Pseudomonas chlororaphis |
CONCLUSION
The four soil samples collected from different Chickpea growing areas were found to harbor PSB in good numbers. A total of 24 PSB isolates were isolated from these samples. Molecular characterization was done by using 16SrRNA sequencing for the promising three isolates for further identification up to species level. The most efficient isolate ACP-3 was identified as Bacillus licheniformis. Other two organisms ACP-2 and CCP-2 were identified as Arthrobacter sp. HPG166 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis respectively. Further green house and trial has to be conducted for knowing their working efficiency.
Acknowledgement
I express my sincere gratitude to Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru for providing all the facility and it makes me immensely proud and honored to be a student of this prestigious university.
REFERENCES
Alagavadi, A. R., & Gaur, A. C., (1988) Associative effect of Rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on the yield and nutrient uptake of Chickpea. Pl. Soil., 105, 241-246.
Alam, S., Khalil, S., Ayub, N., & Rashid, M. (2002). In vitro solubilization of inorganic phosphate by phosphate solubilizing microorganism (PSM) from maize rhizosphere. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 4, 454-458.
Blazevic, D. J., & Ederer, G. M., 1975, Principles Of Biochemical Tests In Diagnostic Microbiology. Wiley And Company, New York, Pp. 13-45.
Cowan, S. T., & Steel, K. J. (1970). Manual For The Identification Of Medical Bacteria. Lowe And Brydon, London.
Dotaniya, M. L. K. K. P, Meena, H. M., & Dasharath, P. (2013). Status and Rational Use Of Rock Phosphate In Agricultural Crop Production A Review. Agric. Sustain. Develop. 1(1), 103-108.
Eckford, M. D. (1927). Thermophilic Bacteria In Milk. Am. J. Hyg., 7, 200-201.
Elliot, L. F., & Lynch, J. M., 1985, Plant Growth Inhibitory Pseudomonads Colonizing Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestvum L.) Roots. Pl. Soil, 84, 57-65.
Guar, A. C., Madan, M., & Ostwal, K. P. (1973). Solubilization Of Phosphatic Compounds By Native Microflora Of Rock Phosphates. Indian J. Exptl. Biol., 11, 427-429.
Hilda, R., & Reynaldo, F. (1999). Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria And Their Role In Plant Growth Promotion. Biotechnol. Adv., 17, 319–339.
Holt, J. G., Kreig, W. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., & Williams, S T., (1994). Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Ninth Edition, Williams And Wilkinson A., Waverly Company.
Illmer, P., & Schinner, F. (1995). Solubilization Of Inorganic Calcium Phosphates Solubilization Mechanisms. Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 257-263.
James, G. C., & Natalie, S. (1992). Microbiology And Laboratory Manual. Rockland Community College, Suffern, New York, Third Edition. The Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Co. Inc., Redwood City California.
Karpagam, T., & Nagalakshmi, P. K., (2014). Isolation And Characterization Of Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes From Agricultural Soil. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol., 3(3), 604-614.
Khan, A. A., Jilani, G., Akhtar, M. S., & Saqlan, S. M., (2014). Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria: Occurrence, Mechanisms And Their Role In Crop Production. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 1(1): 48-58.
Nair, S. K., & Subba Rao, N. S., (1975). Distribution And Activity Of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms In The Rhizosphere Of Coconut And Cocoa Under Mixed Cropping. J. Plantation Crops, 5, 67-70.
Reyes, I., Bernier, L., Simard, R., & Antoun, H., (1999). Effect of Nitrogen Source on the Solubilization of Different Inorganic Phosphates by an Isolate of Penicillium Rugulosum and Two Uv-Induced Mutants. Fems Microbiol. Ecol. 28, 281 290
Sonam, S., Vijaykumar and Rambabu, T., (2011). Isolation Of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganism (Psms) From Soil. J. Microbio. Biotech. Res., 1(2), 90-95.
Thakkar, J., Narsian, V., & Patel, H. H. (1993). Inorganic Phosphate Solubilization by Certain Soil Bacteria. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 31, 743-746.
Vazquez, P., Holguin, G., Puente, M. E., Lopez-Cortes, A., & Bashan, Y. (2000). Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms Associated With The Rhizosphere Of Mangroves In A Semiarid Coastal Lagoon. Biol. Fertility Soils, 30, 460-468.
Vikram, A. (2001). Studies On Mineral Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria In The Vertisols Of Northern Karnataka. Ph.D. Thesis, University Of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
Yadav, B. K., & Tarafdar, J. C. (2011). Penicillium purpurogenum, Unique P mobilizers in arid agroecosystems. Arid Land Res. Manage. 25(1), 87-99.