Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2020, Volume : 8, Issue : 6
First page : (473) Last page : (480)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8489
Effects of Pre-Sowing Treatment on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth Performance of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn
Rakesh Kumar and Prabhat Tiwari*
Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of Horticulture and Forestry
Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi (U.P.) India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: negirakesh632@gmail.com
Received: 2.11.2020 | Revised: 13.12.2020 | Accepted: 19.12.2020
ABSTRACT
Present study was carried out in forest nursery of Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University Jhansi (U.P) in the year 2020-21. To study the effects of pre-sowing treatment on the seed germination and seedling vigour, fresh seeds are collected from Shidh seed sale corp Dehradun (UK) and Seed are clean and graded seeds were subjected to five different pre-sowing treatments for germination viz., Concentrated H2SO4 for 20 minutes followed by rinsing under running tap water (T1), Hot water treatment (100oC) for 10 second (T2), Cow dung treatment for 7 days (T3), Cow urine treatment for 24 hours (T4) and normal water treatment for 48 hours (T5). The study revealed that seed pre-sowing treatments of the Sapindus mukorossi were significantly influenced the seed germination and seedling vigour. Germination percent Seeds subjected to different pre- sowing treatments ranged from 65 to 30 %. Acid treatment (T1) sowing the high germination per cent which is significantly at par with the other treatments. Germination energy was follow these trends T1> T2> T3> T4 > T5. Seedling length was depicted highest value (21.75 cm) in T1 (H2SO4 treatment for 20 minute) which is statistically at par with the other treatments while the minmum value was depicted in T5 (9.83cm). In case of collar daimeter, maximum value was recorded in T1 (4.80 mm) and lowest in T5 (2.51 mm). Whereas, mean root length of the seedlings was highest in T1 (16.58 cm) and lowest in T5 (9.31 cm). The root- shoot ratio also varied significantly among different pretreatments and the highest root- shoot ratio was recorded in T1 i.e. seeds soaked in H2So4 for 20 minute (0.26) and the least in T5 (0.15). With regards to seedling vigour index, the highest vigour index was recorded in T1 (16.72) scarifying the seeds in H2SO4 for 5 minutes and the lowest in T5 (4.37).
Keywords: Pre-sowing treatments, Germination energy, Germination per cent, Root shoot ratio seedling vigour.
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782
Cite this article: Kumar, R., & Tiwari, P. (2020). Effects of pre-sowing treatment on seed germination and seedling growth performance of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 8(6), 473-480. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8489
INTRODUCTION
Sapindus mukorossi is commonly known by several names such as washnut, soap berry, soapnut, aritha and ritha is important MPTs of north India, belongs to family Sapindaceae.
This tree is native to Japan and china and widely cultivated in North India, in moister tracts of Himalayas from Ravi eastwards up to 1500 m asl elevation. Dry friuts of this plant have medicinal and economic value. Fleshy portion of fruit contain saponin, which is a good substitute for washing soap and also insecticidal properties and it is traditionally used for removing lice from the scalp. Other medicinal properties of this fruits are treating various diseases like excessive salivation, pimples, epilepsy, chlorosis, migranes, eczema and psoriasis (Kirtikar & Basu, 1991). The powdered seeds are employed in the treatment of dental caries, arthritis, common colds, constipation and nausea (Dhar et al., 1989).
This species required proper nursery management technique because of its hard seed coat, their gemination is slow and therefore direct sowing of this species is not successful (Anon, 1972). Poor seed germination of ritha seed is one of the prime causes hinders the cultivation of the plants and deferred nursery establishment.Seed treatments can influence seed germination rate and germination process (Azad et al., 2006a; Azad et al., 2011 & Azad et al., 2012). The effect of pre-sowing treatments on seed germination of some tropical forest tree species has been reported by a number of authors (Ahamed et al., 1983; Matin & Rashid, 1992; Koirala et al.; 2000; Khan et al., 2001; Alamgir & Hossain, 2005; Azad et al., 2006b; Matin et al., 2006 & Haider et al., 2014). Present studies were carried out to identify of suitable pre-sowing treatment necessary for quicker and higher seed germination in order to recommend suitable pre-sowing treatment for S. mukorossi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was conducted in the nursery of Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh). Ritha seed were collected from Shidh seed sale corp, Dehradun (UK) during the month of July. Seed are sown in the month of august in the nursery bed. Experimental field was prepared by ploughing the field twice and made smooth by harrowing followed by planking during month of August, 2020. The sunken nursery beds (5m × 1m) were prepared in the nursery area to accommondate all the treatments. The 160 seeds/bed were sown in each Treatment. In each treatment their were four replication, in each replication 40 seed are sown. Seeds were subjected to five pre-sowing treatments viz, T1 (Seeds soaking in concentrated sulfuric acid for 20 minutes followed by rinsing under running tap water), T2 (Seed soaking in Hot water (100oC) for 10 second, T3 (Cow dung slurry for 7 days), T4 (Seeds are soaking in Cow urine for 24 hours) and T5 (Seed soaking in normal water for 48 hours). The graded and treated seeds (160 for each) of ritha were sown at prepared plot. Nursery beds were kept moist by sprinkling water and kept free from weeds.
The experiment was laid down in the nursery in randomized block design with four replications. The following observations were also made. The imbibition period i.e. number of days from sowing to commencement of germination of the seeds, subjected to different pretreatments was recorded. The days taken for completion of germination also was noted. From the daily germination counts, the germination percentage, germination energy, mean daily germination (MDG), peak value of germination (PV) and germination value (GV) were worked out as suggested by Czabator (1962). Germination energy was calculated as the per cent, by number of seeds in a given sample which germinate up to the time of peak germination. Mean daily germination was calculated by using the following formula.
MDG =∑Cumulative germination percent /Number of days after sowing
Peak value is the maximum mean daily germination reached at any time during the period of germination test (Czabator, 1962). Germination value was calculated as GV= PV × MDG. The germination index (GI), which is expressed as speed of germination was calculated as suggested in the Association of Official Seed Analyst (AOSA, 1983).
Seedling vigour
The germinated seedlings belonging to different pretreatments were grown under similar environmental condition for 60 days. The seedlings were evaluated as described in Seedling Evaluation Handbook (AOSA, 1991). At the end of the experiment all seedlings were measured for total height and collar diameter. Twelve seedlings from each treatment were randomly selected for the destructive sampling. The seedling vigour index was determined by multiplying the average germination percentage and seedling length after 45 days of germination. The seeds showing the higher seedling vigour index are considered to be more vigorous (Abdul-Baki & Anderson, 1973).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Germination of seeds of Sapindus mukorossi subjected to varying pretreatments ranged from 65 to 30% (Fig.1). Treatment T1 sowing the high germination per cent which is significantly at par with the other treatment. Seed germination energy was showing these trend T1> T2> T3> T4 > T5. The imbibition period of the seeds varied strikingly with pretreatments applied. The fastest germination i.e. the least imbibition period (14 days) was observed in seeds soaked in acid treatment followed by hot water treatment (16 days) seeds. Whereas, the highest imbibition period (22 days) was recorded in T5 (water soaked for 48 hours). The MDG, PV and GV of the seeds subjected to different pretreatments are given in Fig. 2. The highest MDG was observed in T1 (1.07) which is significatly at par with the other treatment, respectively. While lowest MDG was recorded in T5 (0.49). Peak value of germination also showed similar trend, with seeds treated acid (T1) recording the highest value (0.81), followed by T2 (0.63) and the lowest was in T5 (0.32). Germination value which is product of GV and MDG also showed similar trend, the highest germination index was recorded in T1 (0.81) followed by T2 (0.63) and the lowest was in T5 (0.32) (Table-1).
Out of the five pre-sowing treatments studied, concentrated H2SO4 for 20 minutes followed by rinsing under running tap water (T1) resulted in to higher germination. The concentrated H2SO4 soften the seed coat causing uniform inflow of water and unrestricted expansion of embryo.
Increased germination have also been reported in Albizia lebbek and Cassia siamea (Agboola et al.,2005), Quercus leucotrichophora (Gautam & Bhardwaj, 2001), Acacia nilotica (Khera & Saxena, 2003), Leucaena leucocephala (Puri et al.,2001), Cassia siamea (Kobmoo & Hellum, 1984) and Albizia richardiana (Roy & Pathak, 1983). Germination energy also differs significantly due to pre-sowing treatments. The results are in harmony with those reported in Ribes orientale (Sharma et al., 2005), Acacia auriculiformis (Marunda, 1990), Indigofera pseudotinctoria (Jinnui et al.,2008), Grewia optiva (Singh et al.,1997) and Terminalia bellerica (Chakraborty et al.,1992).
Table 1: Effects of pre-sowing treatments on the seeds of Sapindus mukorossi
Treatment |
Germination per cent |
Germination energy |
Imbibition period |
Mean daily germination |
Peak Value |
Germination index |
T1 |
65.00 |
45.00 |
14.75 |
1.07 |
0.31 |
0.81 |
T2 |
53.13 |
41.25 |
16.00 |
0.87 |
0.25 |
0.63 |
T3 |
46.87 |
35.63 |
18.00 |
0.77 |
0.22 |
0.56 |
T4 |
38.13 |
27.50 |
19.00 |
0.62 |
0.20 |
0.43 |
T5 |
30.00 |
26.25 |
22.00 |
0.49 |
0.16 |
0.32 |
CD 0.05 |
4.39 |
4.69 |
1.32 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Effects of pre- sowing treatments on the variation of seedling growth are sown in Table 2. Analysis of variance revealed significant difference in the growth attributes of the seedlings due to pretreatment at five per cent significance level. The mean shoot length of the seedlings under various treatments was follow the fellowing trend T1>T2>T3>T4>T5. Seedling length was recorded highest value (21.75 cm) in T1 (H2SO4 treatment for 20 minute) which is statistically at par with the other treatment while the minmum value was depicted in T5 (9.83cm). In case of collar daimeter, maximum value was recorded in T1 (4.80 mm) and lowest in T5 (2.51 mm). Whereas, mean root length of the seedlings was the highest in T1 (16.58 cm) and lowest in T5 (9.31 cm).
Table 2: Growth attributes of the seedlings as affected by different pretreatments
Treatment |
Shoot length |
Collar diameter |
Root length |
T1 |
21.75 |
4.80 |
16.58 |
T2 |
17.42 |
4.38 |
13.83 |
T3 |
13.25 |
3.24 |
12.73 |
T4 |
11.42 |
2.77 |
11.49 |
T5 |
9.83 |
2.51 |
9.31 |
CD 0.05 |
1.12 |
0.16 |
0.92 |
Analysis of variance also indicated that the biomass production, root shoot ratio and seedling vigour sowing the higher value in acid treatment whereas minimum value was found in seed treated with normal water. Soaking in H2So4 for 20 minute recorded the highest root biomass (T1, 4.98 g) and it was followed by T2 i.e. soaking in hot water (3.72 g). The lowest shoot biomass (2.30g) was recorded in control (T5). Meanwhile, the total root biomass was the highest in T1 i.e. H2SO4 acid scarification for 20 minute (1.28g) followed by T2 (0.69 g) and the least value was recorded in the control (0.34g) seedlings. The root shoot ratio also varied significantly among different pretreatments and the highest root shoot ratio was recorded in T1 i.e. seeds soaked in H2So4 for 20 minute (0.26) and the least in T5 (0.15). With regards to seedling vigour index, the highest vigour index was recorded in T1 (16.72) scarifying the seeds in H2SO4 for 5 minutes and the lowest in seed were treated with normalwater for 24 hours T5 (4.37) ( Table 3.). This results was closely support by the study conducted by Attri et al., 2015 giving different pre-sowing treatments viz., Immersion in conc. H2SO4 for 20 minutes followed by rinsing in running tap water (T1) were found to be more effective in enhancing the Germination attributes, growth and biomass characteristics viz. germination per-cent (66.22%), minimum number of days to initiate (22.00 days) and complete germination (65.11 days), shoot length (26.97 cm), root length (21.24cm), seedling height (48.21 cm), collar diameter (4.73 mm), number of lateral roots (58.00), dry shoot weight (3.66 g), root weight (1.03 g), and total dry weight 94.69 g). Hard seed coat acts as a barrier for the general seedling growth in natural growing conditions. Increassed germination has been reported in Acacia nilotica (Khera & Saxena, 2003), Albizia lebbek and Acacia siamea (Agboola et al., 2005). Similar results have been reported in Dacryoides edulis when seeds are treated with acid, for significantly improve the performance of seedling as regard to plant height and collar diameter (Agbogidi et al., 2007). Increase in seedling height has been reported in Acacia nilotica (Khera & Saxena, 2003). The effect of pre-sowing treatments varied significantly with respect to biomass production of Sapindus mukorssi seedlings. The data indicated that among the five different pre-sowing treatments, immersion in concentrated H2SO4 for 20 minutes followed by rinsing under running tap water (T4) were found to be most effective in enhancing shoot dry weight, root dry weight and total dry weight. Similar results of increased biomass with sulfuric acid treatment were reported in Acacia nilotica (Khera & Saxena, 2003).
Table 3: Biomass production, root: shoot ratio and vigour index of seedling as affected by pretreatments
Treatments |
Shoot biomass |
Root Biomass |
Total biomass |
Shoot/Root |
Seedling vigour |
T1 |
4.98 |
1.28 |
6.27 |
0.26 |
16.72 |
T2 |
3.72 |
0.69 |
4.44 |
0.19 |
9.83 |
T3 |
3.36 |
0.60 |
3.99 |
0.18 |
8.39 |
T4 |
2.72 |
0.43 |
3.14 |
0.16 |
5.94 |
T5 |
2.30 |
0.34 |
2.64 |
0.15 |
4.37 |
CD 0.05 |
0.12 |
0.09 |
0.16 |
0.02 |
1.76 |
CONCLUSION
The summarization of the present study indicates that the presowing treatments affected the germination parameter of the sapindus seeds and seedling growth also. The treatment with acid once again proved to be the best pretreatment, however, the organic pretreatments like soaking in cow dung slurry and cow urine also produced good germination. The soaking in normal water for 24 hours reduced the germination of the seeds.
REFERENCES
Abdul – Baki, A. A., & Anderson, J. D. (1973). Vigor determination in soybean by multiple criteria. Crop Science, 13, 630-633.
Agbogidi, O. M., Bosah, B. O., & Eshegbeyi, O. F. (2007). Effects of pre-treatment on the germination and seedling growth of African pear (Dacryoides edulis Don, G., & Lam, H. J.). International Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 952—958.
Agboola, D. A., Ebofin, A. O., Aduradola, A. M., & Ajiboye, A. A. (2005). Effect of pre-sowing treatments on the germination of seeds of two savannah tree legumes. Indian Forester 131, 701—710.
Agboola, D. A., Ebofin, A. O., Aduradola, A. M., & Ajiboye, A. A. (2005). Effect of pre-sowing treatments on the germination of seeds of two savannah tree legumes. Indian Forester 131, 701—710.
Ahamed, F. U., Das, S., & Hossain, M. A. (1983). Effect of seed treatment on the germination of rakta kombal seeds. Bano Biggyan Patrica, 12(1), 62–65.
Alamgir, M., & Hossain, M. K. (2005). Effect of pre-sowing treatments on Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth. Seeds and initial development of seedlings in the nursery. Journal of Forestry and Environment, 3, 53–60.
Anonymous, (1972). The Wealth of India, 9, 225-227.
Association of Official Seed Analysis (AOSA) (1991). Rules for testing seeds. Journal of Seed Technology, 12, 18-19.
Association of Official Seed Analysis (AOSA) (1983). Seed Vigor Testing Handbook. Contribution No. 32 to the Handbook on Seed Testing.
Azad, M. S., Biswas, R. K., & Matin, M. A. (2012). Seed germination of Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth in Bangladesh: a basis for seed source variation and pre-sowing treatment effect. Forestry Study in China, 12(2), 124–130.
Azad, M. S., Islam, M. W., Matin, M. A., & Bari, M. A. (2006a). Effect of pre-sowing treatment on seed germination of Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. South Asian Journal of Agriculture, 1(2), 32–34.
Azad, M. S., Manik, M. R., Hasan, M. S., & Matin, M. A. (2011). Effect of different pre-sowing treatments on seed germination percentage and growth performance of Acacia auriculiformis. Journal of Forestry Research, 22(2), 183–188.
Azad, M. S., Matin, M. A., Islam, M. W., & Musa, M. Z. A. (2006b). Effect of pre-sowing treatment on seed germination of Lohakath (Xylia kerrii Craib & Hutch.). Khulna University Studies, 7(2), 33–36.
Chakraborty, A. K., Pandey, O. N., & Bhardwaj, S. D. (1992). Presowing treatment on seeds of Terminalia bellirica. Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University, 4(1), 95-98.
Dhar, J. P., Bajpai, V. K., Setty, B. S., & Kamboj, V. P. (1989). Morphological changes in human spermatozoa as examined under scanning electron microscope after in vitro exposure to saponins isolated from Sapindus mukorossi. Contraception,39, 563-568.
Gautam, J., & Bhardwaj, S. D. (2001). Effect of seed size and pre-sowing treatments on germination of ban oak (Quercus leucotrichophora). Indian Journal of Forestry, 24(3), 311-315.
Haider, M. R., Alam, M. S., & Hossain, M. A. (2014). Effect of pre-sowing treatment on seed germination and seedlings growth attributes of Acacia catechu Willd in nursery and field conditions. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, 3 (4), 214-219.
Jinnui, Y., Lixing, H., Minge, B., Hua, Q., & Tanjun, Z. (2008). Effect of different treatments on seed germination of Indigofera pseudotinctoria. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 25(5), 57-60.
Khan, B. M., Koirala, B., & Hossian, M. K. (2001). Effect of different pre-sowing treatments on germination and seedling growth attributes in Ghora Neem (Melia azedarach L.). Malaysian Forester, 64(1), 14–20.
Khera, N., & Saxena, A. K. (2003). Effect of pre-sowing treatments on seed germination and seedling growth of Acacia nilotica willd. Range Management and Agroforestry, 24(2), 104-113.
Neeraj, K., & Saxena, A. K. (2003). Effect of pre-sowing treatments on seed germination and seedling growth of Acacia nilotica willd. Range Management and agroforestry 24, 104—113.
Kirtikar, K. R., & Basu, B. D. (1991). Indian medicinal plants. Allahabad: B.L.M. Publication, 1, pp. 633.
Kobmoo, B., & Hellum, A. K. (1984). Hot water and acid improve their germination of Cassia siamea Britt. Seeds Embryani, 1, 27-33.
Koirala, B., Hossain, M. K., & Hossain, M. S. (2000). Effects of different pre-sowing treatments on Adenanthera pavonia L. seeds and initial seedlings development in the nursery. Malaysian Forester, 63(2), 82–91.
Mathur, R. S., Sharma, K. K., & Rawat, M. M. S. (1984). Germination behaviour of various provenances of Acacia nilotica species indica. Indian Forester, 110(5), 435-499.
Matin, M. A., & Rashid, M. H. (1992). Seed morphology, germination and seedling survival of Albizia trees in the Nursery. Bangladesh Journal of Forest science, 21(1), 40–45.
Puri, S., Agrawal, S., Patel, R. K., & Swamy, S. L. (2001). Germination and viability testing of some multipurpose trees used in agroforestry practices. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 3(1), 69-79.
Roy, M. M., & Pathak, P. S. (1983). Seed polymorphism and germination in Albizia richardiana King & Prain. My forest,19(2), 89-95.
Sharma, S., Kumar, S., Thakur, K. S., & Negi, P. S. (2005). Study on effect of pre-sowing treatments on germination of Ribes orientale Desf. Seeds. Indian Forester, 131(5), 667-672.