Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2020, Volume : 8, Issue : 3
First page : (727) Last page : (736)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8212
A Study on Knowledge and Attitude of Farmers and Constraints Faced by Them on Soil Health Cards in Mandya District of Karnataka
Madhu H.R.1, A.D. Ranganatha2, G. Nagesha3 and Mahesh D. S.4*
1M.Sc. (Agri). P.G. Research Scholar, Department of Agricultural Extension, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru
2Associate Professor & Head and 3Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension,
College of Agriculture, V.C. Farm, Mandya, UAS, Bengaluru
4Scientist, CMER&TI, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, Assam
*Corresponding Author E-mail: maheshdnpura@gmail.com
Received: 15.05.2020 | Revised: 19.06.2020 | Accepted: 25.06.2020
ABSTRACT
The present study was carried out during 2018-19 to analyse the knowledge and attitude level of farmers about Soil Health Card (SHC). Out of 120 soil health card holders 60 farmers were selected from each in Mandya and Maddur taluks of Mandya district. The respondents were randomly selected for the study. Data was collected using a pre-tested interview schedule. A large number of the farmers (49.16%) had medium level of overall knowledge regarding SHC, while 27.50 and 23.33 per cent of the farmers had high and low level of overall knowledge regarding SHC, respectively. It was also found that a majority of farmers (80.00%) were having favorable to more favorable attitude towards SHC. Education, achievement motivation, management orientation, scientific orientation, Cosmopoliteness, mass media exposure, risk orientation, extension agency and extension participation of farmers had significant to highly significant association with their knowledge and attitude towards SHC. Around 70 and 72 per cent of the variation in the knowledge and attitude level of farmers respectively It was explained by all the 14 independent variables selected for the research study. Delay in distribution of soil health cards, fertilizers calculations are not given in SHC, difficulty in following the soil test based results, illiteracy of farmers, lack of awareness regarding method of soil sampling and inadequate follow-up by extension agency were the major problems faced by the farmers.
Keywords: Soil health card, Profile characteristics, Knowledge, Attitude, Constraints, Suggestions
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782
Cite this article: Madhu, H.R., Ranganatha, A.D., Nagesha, G., & Mahesh, D. S. (2020). A Study on Knowledge and Attitude of Farmers and Constraints Faced by Them on Soil Health Cards in Mandya District of Karnataka, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 8(3), 727-736. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8212
INTRODUCTION
ndia is on the verge to improve the agricultural productivity by improving the soil quality and crop quality in a sustainable way. In this view, central government had launched the soil health card scheme in February 2015 with an aim to promote soil test based application of fertilisers in respect of all the 14 crore holdings in the country and to implement uniform norms in sampling and testing of soil. Under this scheme, soil health cards are given to farmers for their land holdings for every 3 years. Soil health card was a printed report and it provides information about 12 soil parameters (pH, EC, organic carbon, macro nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur and micro nutrients like zinc, iron, manganese, copper and boron). It also suggests corrective measures that a farmer should adopt to obtain better yield. Soil test based recommendations not only increase the crop production with judicial investment on fertilizers but also help to keep the sustainable soil productivity.
The soil health card scheme brings together the scientific community in the field of agriculture, the information repository of latest tool, techniques and cropping practices, the farmers and the government for the economic upliftment of the people at large. Since, change in knowledge preceded acceptance and application of an innovation, it was therefore, always important to find out the factors responsible for positive or negative attitude associated with farmer toward the soil health card. With this background, there is a need to assess the knowledge and attitude of farmers about soil health card. Keeping this in view, the present investigation was designed with the following objectives.
An earnest attempt has been made in this study to explore the knowledge and attitude level of farmers towards soil health card. This provides a valuable feedback to the government about the effectiveness of soil health card scheme. The study also aims to document the constraints faced and suggestions by the farmers in the usage of soil health card which will helpful to concerned authorities to tackle the problems and make the scheme farmer friendly. The results of the study will help the concerned policy makers, researchers and extension agencies to give thought and redesign the extension efforts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted in Mandya and Maddur taluks of Mandya district of Karnataka state during the year 2018-19. Mandya district was purposively chosen for the study as it is significantly distributed highest number of soil health cards to farmers as compare to other districts of the state. Mandya and Maddur taluks were selected among the seven taluks of the Mandya district, based on the highest number of soil health cards distributed. The village-wise information relating to soil health card holders were obtained from Department of Agriculture and ICAR KVK Mandya. The top six villages having the highest number of soil health card holders in Mandya and Maddur taluks were selected for the purpose of the study. Sixty farmers from each taluk by considering 10 farmers from each selected village and thus the total sample constituted to 120.
Ex-post-facto research design was adopted for the research study. Data was collected personally from the respondents using a pre-tested interview schedule.
The dependent and independent variables for the present investigation were chosen based on the available literature and the objectives of the investigation.
Operationalization and measurement of variables
Variables |
|
a) Knowledge |
B. Independent variable |
|
1 |
Age |
2 |
Education |
3 |
Annual income |
4 |
Occupation |
5 |
Land holding size |
6 |
Farming experience |
7 |
Scientific orientation |
8 |
Risk orientation |
9 |
Management orientation |
10 |
Achievement motivation |
11 |
Cosmopoliteness |
12 |
Extension participation |
13 |
Mass media exposure |
14 |
Extension contact |
Respondents were asked to express problems faced by them in the usage of soil health card. The problems faced by them are termed as constraints in the study.Thus, obtained responses were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage. Suggestions were articulated by the farmers for better usage of soil health card were recorded and were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage.
The data collection was done during the period March-April 2019 by personal interview method with the help of the constructed interview schedule.
The data collected for the purpose of the study were quantified, categorized and tabulated. The following statistical tools were used in the study to analyse the data.
Mean: The arithmetic mean is the sum of the scores divided by their number. This measure was used to categorize the dependent and independent variables into low, medium and high categories.
Sum of observed values
Mean = --------------------------------
Number of observations
Frequency: This measure was used to know the distribution pattern of respondents, variable wise and to categorize the problems perceived by seed growers in order of importance.
Percentage: This measure was used for simple comparisons.
Standard deviation: This measure was used to categorize the dependent and independent variables into low, medium and high categories.
Chi-square test: The chi-square test was applied to find out the association between independent (Profile characteristics) and dependent variables (knowledge and attitude of farmers about soil health card.). It is the difference between the observed and expected frequencies; same was squared and divided by the expected frequencies. Further, all the quantities obtained independently are added then the sum total obtained is Chi-square (χ2) value.
Χ2 = Σ (fo – fe) 2/ fe
Where, fo = observed frequencies
fe = expected frequencies
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Association between profile characteristics of the farmers with their knowledge and attitude about SHC.
Chisquare test was employed to find out the association between profile characteristics of the farmers with their knowledge and attitude about SHC.
The association between profile characteristics of the farmers with their knowledge regarding SHC presented in table 1. The results reveals that variables such as, age, occupation, annual income, land holding and farming experience had non significant association with the knowledge level of farmers, whereas variables such as achievement motivation, management orientation, cosmopolitans, risk orientation and mass media exposure of farmers had significant association with their knowledge level on SHC at five per cent level. Variables such as, education, scientific orientation, extension agency contact and extension participation of farmers had highly significant association with their knowledge level regarding SHC at one per cent level. The results obtained were in line with the similar studies done by Banerjee (1976), Prakash and De (2009), Lakshminarayan et al. (2013) and Prabuilliger et al.(2017).
The explanation for the profile characteristics of the farmers having significant to highly association with the knowledge level regarding SHC was discussed in the following paragraphs.
The chi-square test revealed a highly significant association exist between the education of farmers with their knowledge level regarding SHC at one per cent level. Education of an individual provides an opportunity for the farmers to expose themselves to mass media (radio, television, newspaper etc.), which carry messages on the special features and benefits of SHC scheme, hence there exist a significant relationship between education and knowledge level.
Achievement motivation was the important determinant of excellence or perfection in what one does. It forces the individual towards reaching the goals which he/she has to set for himself. The farmers have excelled in knowing and obtaining the benefits of the SHC for excelling in agriculture by contacting extension functionaries and participating in extension activities. Hence, there exists a significant association at five per cent level between achievement motivation of the farmers with their knowledge regarding SHC.
The probable reason for management orientation of farmers in having significant association at five per cent level with their knowledge regarding SHC could be due to the inculcation of managerial abilities in the farmers through extension activities (meetings/discussion, training programs, field visits, demonstrations, exposure visits, farm school etc.) organized. The orientation towards these extension activities by Karnataka State Department of Agriculture has increased knowledge regarding SHC among farmers.
It was clear from the data depicted in the table that scientific orientation had significant association with the knowledge level of respondents towards soil health card at one per cent level of significance. The higher achievement motivation and management orientation inspires them to know scientific advantages of SHC.
A cosmopolite farmer during his visit to offices of agricultural extension personnel which are located at Hobli/ Taluk/ District, might have seen the display of information on SHC. He might have interacted with the agricultural extension personnel regarding the procedure of getting benefits under SHC. Hence, there exists a significant association between Cosmo politeness of farmers with their knowledge level regarding SHC.
Higher levels of mass media exposure would have facilitated the farmers to develop habits of gathering information about SHC implemented by Department of Agriculture, hence there was a significant association between mass media exposure of farmers with their knowledge regarding SHC.
There existed a highly significant association between risk orientation and the knowledge level of farmers at five per cent level. The reason may be farmers take moderate risk to precisely to achieve success, stabilized and maximization of yield and income by following SHC information.
There was highly significant association between the extension agency contacts of farmers with their knowledge regarding SHC. Agricultural extension professionals not only communicate about the latest farm technologies to the farmers, but they also inform the farmers about various agricultural or extension programs /schemes /reforms implemented by State Department of Agriculture. Hence, farmers with high level of extension agency contact have more knowledge regarding SHC.
The results of the study reveal that extension participation of farmers was highly significant associated with the knowledge level regarding SHC. Participation in extension activities such as, group discussion, demonstrations, training programs, field days, farmers field school, krishimelas, etc., organized would promote in gaining knowledge among farmers regarding the scope and benefits for farmers by SHC. Hence, there exist a significant association between extension participation and knowledge level.
Hence, the hypothesis set for the study i.e., there is no association between the profile characteristics of the farmers with their knowledge level regarding SHC is partially rejected, since many of the profile characteristics of the farmers had significant and some are highly significant association with the knowledge level regarding SHC.
Table 1: Association between profile characteristics of the farmers with their knowledge regarding SHC
Sl. No. |
Characteristics |
Chi-square value |
C-value |
1 |
Age |
3.67NS |
0.17 |
2 |
Education |
10.04** |
0.27 |
3 |
Occupation |
5.67NS |
0.21 |
4 |
Annual income |
6.01NS |
0.21 |
5 |
Land holding |
3.74NS |
0.17 |
6 |
Farming experience |
4.46NS |
0.18 |
7 |
Achievement motivation |
10.34* |
0.28 |
8 |
Management orientation |
11.88* |
0.30 |
9 |
Scientific orientation |
10.10** |
0.27 |
10 |
Cosmopoliteness |
9.45* |
0.27 |
11 |
Mass media exposure |
10.33* |
0.28 |
12 |
Risk orientation |
11.33* |
0.29 |
13 |
Extension agency contact |
17.39** |
0.35 |
14 |
Extension participation |
16.69** |
0.34 |
NS=Non-significant, *=Significant at 5% level, **=Significant at 1% level
The data in table 2 shows the association between profile characteristics of the farmers with their attitude towards SHC. A perusal of table reveals that age, occupation, annual income, land holding and farming experience of farmers had no association with their attitude towards SHC. Education, achievement motivation, management orientation, scientific orientation, cosmopoliteness and mass media exposure of farmers had significant association with their attitude towards SHC at five per cent level. Variables, such as risk orientation, extension agency contact and extension participation of farmers had highly significant association with their attitude towards SHC at one per cent level. Similar findings were reported by Banerjee (1976), Prasad and Sundaraswamy (2000) and Subhash (2018).
The explanation for the independent variables having significant to highly significant association with the attitude towards SHC is given in the ensuring paragraphs.
Education widens the vision and minds of people, besides orienting them to the outside world. Educated farmers might have contacted the agricultural extension workers to obtain the information on SHC (importance and the benefits to farmers) and have developed favourable attitude towards SHC. Hence, it may be concluded that education of the farmers influences the attitude towards SHC.
Achievement is the value associated with an individual that drives them to excel in farming and thereby attain a sense of personal accomplishment. In order to achieve this distinction, the farmers would have availed the benefits of SHC in the form of reducing input cost by balanced use of chemical fertilizers. Hence, there exists a significant association between the achievement motivations of farmers with their attitude towards SHC.
Management orientation offers a chance for better management of resources resulting in greater efforts toward excellence in farming. The urge to perform better than others will act as an instrument to acquire and adopt managerial components relating to agriculture. SHC provide information regarding balanced use of fertilizers to the farmers and increases the income of farmers thereby helping the farmers in managing their farm enterprise. Thus, there was a significant association between management orientation of farmers with their attitude towards SHC.
Scientific orientation develops trustworthiness in scientific methods of agricultural technology which ultimately build up confidence which act as catalyst in rational thinking lead to its significant influence in developing favourable attitude towards SHC.
A cosmopolitan farmer always looks for more information on improved agricultural technologies and various schemes implemented by the line departments. Hence, these farmers will more frequently visit the offices of the line department developments located at towns to derive more benefits from State and central government sponsored agricultural programmes. As a consequence, there exists a highly significant association between the cosmopoliteness of the farmers and their attitude towards SHC.
Exposure to mass media like radio, television, newspaper, magazines etc., has helped the farmers in knowing the various benefits under SHC. The farmer feels that the SHC enables them to increase their knowledge on crop planning and was an effective means to increase agricultural production. Hence, there exists a significant association at one per cent level between mass media exposure of farmers with their attitude towards SHC.
A highly significant association was observed between the risk orientation and attitude of farmers towards SHC at 1 per cent level of significance. The reason may be farmers take moderate risk to precisely to achieve success, stabilized and maximization of yield and income by following SHC information.
Frequent contacts with the agricultural extension functionaries have helped the farmers in knowing about the benefits available to farmers by SHC. The farmers believe that SHC would help in increasing the crop productivity and income. Hence, contact with extension agency has exhibited a highly significant association with their attitude towards SHC at one per cent level.
It can be observed from the results that extension participation of farmers had positive and significant association with the attitude towards SHC. Frequent and active participation of farmers in extension activities organized about SHC might act as strong motivational factor for possessing favourable attitude towards SHC.
The hypothesis set for the study i.e., There is no association between the profile characteristics of the farmers with their attitude towards SHC is partially rejected, since more number of the profile characteristics of farmers had significant to highly significant association with attitude towards SHC.
Table 2: Association between profile characteristics of the farmers with their attitude towards SHC
Sl. No. |
Characteristics |
Chi-square value |
C-value |
1 |
Age |
1.49NS |
0.10 |
2 |
Education |
10.46* |
0.28 |
3 |
Occupation |
3.60NS |
0.17 |
4 |
Annual income |
3.41NS |
0.17 |
5 |
Land holding |
1.09NS |
0.10 |
6 |
Farming experience |
5.48NS |
0.21 |
7 |
Achievement motivation |
11.47* |
0.29 |
8 |
Management orientation |
10.21* |
0.28 |
9 |
Scientific orientation |
11.61* |
0.29 |
10 |
Cosmopoliteness |
9.89* |
0.27 |
11 |
Mass media exposure |
12.16* |
0.30 |
12 |
Risk orientation |
10.11** |
0.28 |
13 |
Extension agency contact |
13.67** |
0.31 |
14 |
Extension participation |
14.11** |
0.31 |
NS=Non-significant, *=Significant at 5% level, **=Significant at 1% level
II. Association between knowledge and attitude of farmers about soil health card
The results presented in the table 3 indicated that, both the dependent variables were associated with chi-square value of 15.09 which was significant at one per cent level of significance.
Out of the 28 farmers who had low level of knowledge on soil health card (16.66 %) had less favourable attitude towards soil health card. Out of 59 farmers with medium knowledge, one-fifth of them (20.00 %) had favourable attitude towards soil health card and out of 33 farmers with high knowledge level, almost all of them (25.00 %) had more favourable attitude towards soil health card.
Table 3: Association between knowledge and attitude of farmers about soil health card.
(n=120)
Attitude |
Knowledge |
Chi-square value |
|||||||
Low |
Medium |
High |
Total |
15.09** |
|||||
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
||
Less favorable |
20 |
16.66 |
2 |
1.66 |
2 |
1.66 |
24 |
19.98 |
|
Favorable |
4 |
3.33 |
24 |
20 |
1 |
0.83 |
29 |
24.16 |
|
More favorable |
4 |
3.33 |
33 |
27.50 |
30 |
25 |
67 |
55.83 |
|
Total |
|
23.32 |
|
49.16 |
|
27.49 |
120 |
100.00 |
|
III. Constraints faced by the farmers in the usage of soil health card
The constraints faced by the farmers in the usage of soil health card are presented in Table 4. Delay in distribution of soil health cards (85%) and devoid of fertilizer calculations in soil health card (69.16%) were the major constraint expressed by the farmers in the usage of soil health card.
Difficulty in following the soil test based results (58.33 %) and illiteracy of farmers (56.67) were the next major constraints. Equal per cent of farmers (50.00 %) each perceived lack of awareness regarding method of soil sampling and 41.67 per cent farmers were facing inadequate follow-up by extension agency
. Table 4: Constraints faced by the farmers in the usage of SHC
n=120
Sl. No |
Constraints |
F |
% |
Rank |
1 |
Delay in distribution of soil health cards |
102 |
85 |
I |
2 |
Illiteracy of farmers |
68 |
56.67 |
IV |
3 |
Lack of awareness regarding method of soil sampling |
60 |
50.00 |
V |
4 |
Inadequate follow-up by extension agency |
50 |
41.67 |
VI |
5 |
Difficulty in following the soil test based results |
70 |
58.33 |
III |
6 |
Fertilizer calculations are not given in soil health card |
83 |
69.16 |
II |
Constraint analysis has become an important thrust area of extension research in recent days. The constraint analysis would help to lubricate the process of diffusion of new technologies among farmers. The constraints faced by the farmers in the usage of soil health card are discussed below.
Majority of the farmers complained about delay in the distribution of soil health card, due to which farmers were not able to practice recommended fertilizer application. Results need to be provided before commencement of kharif season so that farmers can be benefitted more.
It was difficult for the illiterate farmers to refer and understand the content of soil health card they need the assistance of other literate farmers in this regard. Therefore, illiteracy of farmers was considered as one of the constraint.
Suggestion refers as an opinion about constraints which can be used as solution to overcome or to minimize them. In order to develop an extension strategy, it was essential to seek the opinion of the respondents who directly involved in use of SHCs. The constraints faced by them may sometimes be imaginary and sometimes due to lack of coordination of different levels.
The respondents were requested to offer their valuable suggestions against difficulties faced by them in use of Soil Health Card. The suggestions receiving high percentage was considered as an important suggestion and the suggestion receiving low percentage considered as less important.
Table 5: Suggestions expressed by the farmers to overcome constraints
(n=120)
Sl. No. |
Suggestions |
Farmers |
||
Number |
Per cent |
Rank |
||
1 |
Government could organize training programs to aware farmers about SHC |
76 |
63.33 |
V |
2 |
SHC should made available on time |
102 |
85 |
I |
3 |
Training should be given on proper method of collecting soil sample |
87 |
72.50 |
II |
4 |
Method of fertilizer application should be given |
83 |
69.16 |
III |
5 |
Soil sampling procedure should be done in presence of farmers |
80 |
66.66 |
IV |
The data presented in table 5 reveal that major suggestions given by the farmers to overcome the constraints associated with acceptance of soil health card were: SHC should made available on time (85%), Training should be given on proper method of collecting soil sample (72.50%), Method of fertilizer application should be given (69.16%), Soil sampling procedure should be done in presence of farmer (66.66%) and Government could organize training programs to aware farmers about SHC (63.33%).
To optimize the findings, majority of the farmers had suggested that there should be timely availability of Soil Health Card to the farmers. Training should be given on proper method of collecting soil sample and method of fertilizer application should be displayed in SHC.
CONCLUSION
The soil health card scheme brings together the scientific community in the field of agriculture, the information repository of latest tool, techniques and cropping practices, the farmers and the government for the economics upliftment of the rural people at large. Since, change in knowledge preceded acceptance and application of an innovation, it was therefore, always important to find out the factors responsible for positive or negative disposition associated with farmer toward the soil health card. Education, achievement motivation, management orientation, scientific orientation, cosmopoliteness, mass media exposure, risk orientation, extension agency contact and extension participation of farmers had significant to highly significant association with their knowledge and attitude towards SHC. About 70 and 72 per cent of the variation in the knowledge and attitude level of farmers respectively was explained by the 14 profile characteristics selected for the research study. Delay in distribution of SHC (Rank I), devoiding fertilizer calculation in SHC (Rank II), difficulty in following the soil test based results (Rank III), and inadequate follow up by the extension agency (Rank IV) were the major problems faced by the farmers. SHC should made available on time (Rank I), training should be given on proper method of collecting soil sample (Rank II), method of fertilizers application should be given(Rank III) and soil sampling procedure should be done in presence of the farmers (Rank IV) were the important suggestions offered by the farmers for the effective usage of SHC.
REFERENCES
Banerjee, S.K., (1976). A study of socio economic and demographic factors associated to the knowledge of agriculture technology among tribal farmers of Bastar district of Chattisgarh, M.Sc. (Agri.), Thesis (Unpub,), College of Agriculture, Jabalpur.
Lakshminarayana, M. T., Krishnamurthy, B., Manjunath, B. N., & Mahadevaiah, D., (2013). Extent of adoption of recommended practices of sugarcane cultivation by farmers. J. Ext. Educ., 9, 2033-2036
Prasad, M. S., & Sundaraswamy, B. (2000). Attitude of farmers towards dryland agricultural technologies. Journal of Extension Education. 11(1), 2666-2671.
Prakash, S., & Dipak, D. (2009). A study on institutional innovations in technology dissemination: A world bank assisted project. Journal of Global Communication 23(2), 17-18.
Subhash, C., (2018). Impact of Agricultural Technology Management Agency on Adoption of Wheat Production Technology by the Farmers in Sri Ganganagar District of Rajasthan, M. Sc. (Agri.), Thesis(Unpub.),Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner.