Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience (IJPAB)
Year : 2018, Volume : 6, Issue : 6
First page : (728) Last page : (735)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.6943
Biocontrol Activity and PGPR Ability of Different Isolates of Pseudomonas and Bacillus on Tomato
A. Ramakrishna1*, S. Desai 2, G. Uma Devi1 and T. Uma Maheswari3
1Department of Plant Pathology, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad – 500030, India
2Division of Crop Science, ICAR-CRIDA, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad-500059, India
3Department of Entomology, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad – 500030, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ramakrishnaasu@gmail.com
Received: 11.10.2018 | Revised: 24.11.2018 | Accepted: 30.11.2018
ABSTRACT
The present study was to determine the efficacy of bacterial biocontrol agents against Alternaria solani. Among 20-each isolates of Pseudomonas, Bacillus spp. tested for their biocontrol ability against A. solani, Pseudomonas (P28) showed maximum inhibition (74.19%) of the pathogen and Bacillus (B299) showed maximum inhibition (61.94%) of the pathogen. Same set of Pseudomonas and Bacillus isolates were evaluated for their plant growth promoting ability on tomato. There was 100 percent germination in all the treatments of Pseudomonas and Bacillus showing that all the isolates did not possess any deleterious effect towards seed germination. Among Pseudomonas treatments, isolate P43 recorded highest seedling vigour index (1502) followed by isolate P17 (1493). Among Bacillus treatments, isolate B100 recorded highest seedling vigour index (1636) followed by isolate B26 (1586), the lowest being by isolate B27 (996), which was less than control.
Key words: Biocontrol, PGPR, tomato, Pseudomonas and Bacillus.
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782
Cite this article: Ramakrishna, A., Desai, S., Uma Devi, G. and Uma Maheswari, T., Biocontrol Activity and PGPR Ability of Different Isolates of Pseudomonas and Bacillus on Tomato, Int. J. Pure App. Biosci.6(6): 728-735 (2018). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.6943